Monday, March 06, 2006

IA

None of the military folks I know are happy.  

Normally, these are people who greet life with ebullience neatly camouflaged behind a façade of darkly twisted humor.  

I’ll give you an example.  One morning at sea some years ago, I stood with two of my shipmates on the fo’c’sle (all the way up on the bow) of our ship, USS COWPENS (CG 63), as one of them prepared to lob two concussion grenades over the side as sound effects for our battle-readiness training.  I had another role to fulfill that morning, but wouldn’t be needed until later, so I hoped to have an opportunity to toss one of the grenades.  No particular reason, I just wanted to be able to say I’d once thrown a grenade.  As leading chief of the division we three were in, I could occasionally do things like that.

Our conversation may have been jovial, but none of us was anything less than serious about the task at hand.  A single mistake could kill all three of us.  Basically, it was a regular day in the U.S. Navy.

The sound of a rapidly clanging bell cut our conversation short, followed by an announcement on the 1MC*: Fire, fire, fire!  Class Charlie fire in After Steering.  Away the Flying Squad, Away!

We exchanged glances.

There was a moment of reflective silence, as we all shifted a little nervously from foot to foot.  A fire aboard ship can always lead to a long dip in the Deep Blue.

“Well,” I said, “if there’s got to be a fire in After Steering, I can’t think of any place I’d rather be than up here on the fo’c’sle.”

You’re glad to be here!” said my buddy Matt.  He pointed a thumb at Dan, and chuckled, “He’s the one holding the grenades!”

In short, sailors are fun-loving and fatalistic about the dangers they’ve chosen to face.

There’s a key word in that last sentence: chosen.

Two weeks ago, our command got a message announcing its obligation to support a program called “Individual Augmentation”, which is an attempt to help the Army and Marine Corps meet their personnel rotation requirements in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo, the Horn of Africa, and Guantanimo Bay by sending sailors to work in supporting roles such as communications specialists and prison guards.  Each “Individual Augmentee” serves in his or her role for a minimum of one year.

There was a list of names accompanying the message.  One of my office mates has been slated to go, and as of this morning, the rest have been put on notice that they, too, may be expected to go at any time.  At the school next door, seven people are going.

Before they are assigned to a new and exciting location, they’ll undergo three days of medical screening and be offered time to take care of any legal matters (such as the writing of a will), followed by seven days of physical fitness, weapons, and tactics training.  They’ll spend an hour or two learning about “Improvised Explosive Devices” (IEDs…booby traps), another hour or two on land navigation, a couple hours on convoy operations, and a couple on urban combat operations.  The last of the seven days will be a practical exercise offering them an opportunity to put the things they’ve learned in the classroom to good use.

This is a Bad Idea.  

First, these are people who bring a skill set that is entirely alien to the ground-pounder’s battlefield, and virtually none of what they know now will stand them in good stead when they climb aboard that first convoy.  

Second, this lack of knowledge will make them a danger to themselves and to the units they are sent to augment.

Third, the danger that these individual augmentees bring with them will undermine the esprit de corps that is essential for a unit’s ability to perform its combat function.

Finally, no one volunteered for this shit.

In the short term, more American military members will die, and the war will last longer.  In the longer term, our all-volunteer military will collapse from the inevitable wholesale departure of smart, well-trained professionals who won’t put up with such an egregious misapplication of their talents.

By now, you may be questioning the intelligence and sanity of our current leadership.  Even if you hadn’t been already.

Actually, gentle reader, this is the cost of, “Oppose the war, support the troops.”

I turned it around on you, didn’t I?  

The simple truth is that those who did choose to serve in the military are now being asked to accept the unthinkable because the average citizen couldn’t be bothered to pitch in.  If you look back at past generations…your parents and grandparents…you’ll see that they rallied to their cause in ways our generation has dismissed as quaint, ignorant, and misguided.  The members of Easy Company, 506th Battalion, 101st Airborne Division didn’t start asking about going home until the Germans capitulated.  The men who commissioned the first USS COWPENS (CVL 25) deployed to the Pacific Theater in 1943 and didn’t come home for twenty-three months.  No one told them they’d be able to go home in six months, or eight, or ten, or a year; they were shown a job, and they simply did it the best they could until they led the procession of American warships into Tokyo Bay in August 1945.  They were prepared to go longer, if necessary, and nothing short of Unconditional Surrender could have convinced them that their task was done.

For the average citizen in this country today, guts are quaint and tenacity is misguided.  Relationships are not the only things we can’t commit to.

There is a principle of strategy that was taught by the great samurai Miyamoto Musashi that went like this: Do not commit to combat until it is certain that you must.  When you do, turn neither to the left nor to the right; drive directly toward the center of your enemy, and do not stop until one of you is defeated.

Perhaps it was never truly certain that we should commit to war in Iraq.  But once committed, we should…as a nation of citizens…have pressed forward until we achieved unconditional surrender, instead of settling for what we have -- the hellishly slow descent through stalemate into self-induced defeat.  Anyone who thinks we’d simply have installed a puppet government and left it to its own efforts to rebuild needs to visit Japan or Germany…both of which are leaders on the world stage, and neither feels any particular obligation to support the US at the expense of its own interests.

Opposed to the war?  Fine.  Noted.  Like it nor not, we are there now, and if we were to leave now, we’d cause more harm than if we stayed to get the job done.  So we might as well roll up our sleeves and get it done.

Support the troops?  I have a suggestion for you, then: Become one.



* PA system aboard ship

4 comments:

Erica said...

Amen, Kurt. I fully support you on this post. I have thought mostly the same way all along - thinking of WWII and what a huge difference there is in this country between that war and this one. People say this war isn't valid, Bush lied, whatever. But the fact is, we're over there now and the job has to be finished. The military losses in WWII were breathtaking for all the Allied Forces, and went on for years. People bitch about the humiliation of those poor babies in Gitmo but I've read reports about what the Japanese did to their POWs while forcing them to build a railway across the country that made me sick. It's war. It's not supposed to be pretty or fair. I'm no soldier, but I agree with Miyamoto Musashi's principle: avoid it if possible, then commit if you must, and steadfastly stay the course until it's over.

Did I mention lately, thank you for your service? :-)

Condoleesa said...

That scares the crap outta me too.

Incidentally, I have thrown quite a few grenades and found them heavy and not easy to lob. I never got them much over 50 ft.

Sherri said...

Kurt,

I agree with you. However, I think it is very difficult for civilians who have no military affiliation whatsoever to fully understand what being a military member (or the spouse of one!) really means.

Here are some things that come to mind:

Pride, Courage, Sacrifice, Honor, Satisfaction, Security, Fulfillment.

Pride in serving your country.

Courage in doing what might be unpopular and dangerous.

Sacrifice in leaving your family and possibly losing your life.

Honor in all that you do.

Satisfaction in a job well done.

Security in knowing that your shipmates (or wives club) will always have your back.

Fulfillment in a life with meaning.

That's what the military means to me and my husband who is a proud Navy Chief!

A lot of people forget that this is what servicemen and women train for. This is what they volunteer for. And this is what we spouses understand when we sign on for this life.

My husband was on the short list for Iraq just last month. He would have been going to Baghdad to assist in communications. And if he was chosen he would have gone willingly (and probably happily) But, lucky for me (who hates to be alone), the Navy in all their wisdom, decided that his expertise would be much better used on a ship in Mayport!

That's right I'll be Jacksonville bound in June!

Yoda said...

Ahhh, Sherri...

I agree with you and applaud both your words and your life as a Navy wife.

I disagree with this statement: "A lot of people forget that this is what servicemen and women train for. This is what they volunteer for."

No. This is most definitely NOT what most of these servicemen and women train for. Granted, your husband, as a communications specialist, is well-suited for the kinds of things I wrote about (though I would argue that in spite of his suitability, a few days of PowerPoint presentations would not prepare him for the realities of service there), but most of the folks going over there were picked simply because they have professional backgrounds that have passing similarities to their IA duties. One reservist I know who has a Tomahawk missile background which includes an understanding of satellite communications was recalled to active duty and sent for a year of very specialized communications duties which he is having to learn on the job, in a combat zone.

In the civilian sector, this is the equivalent of hiring someone with a Masters in Human Resources Management, but no background education, to work as a high school principal...and telling them that it shouldn't be that big a deal, the job just takes people skills. And oh, by the way, we're sending you to a school in South Central.

Ten years ago now, I had a discussion with a woman I was dating about President Clinton's decision to send troops into Bosnia, a plan I opposed rather vehemently, on the grounds of being grateful that no one intervened in OUR civil war. ("We'll have a plan to get our troops out in six months," he said. "I promise." We're still there.) She asked if I would go, and I said that I would, if I were ordered to. She was aghast -- why would I serve in harm's way when I was so opposed to the mission at hand?

Because I swore an oath. I made a committment that I will honor, even at the cost of my freedom and my life.

The discussion degenerated into some unpleasantness (her exact words were, "goose-stepping Nazi"), which I defuzed by stating unequivocally that I would never be sent into such a position because my training was in other fields, and there would never be a need of my services there.

Never say never.

~Kurt