A friend of mine sent me this thought today: A win-win situation: Dig a moat the length of the Mexican border, take the dirt and raise the levees in New Orleans, and then put the Florida alligators into the border moat! Any other problems you would like for me to solve?
Clever.
He also sent me this, which is timely, this being Memorial Day Weekend, and all. The music accompanying the slide show is from the movie, “Glory”, which is about the first US Army unit comprised entirely of Blacks.
The combination of the two got me to thinking about immigration and time spent in our nation’s service. One immigrant I met baffled me somewhat – we met in boot camp. He was a lunatic Brit from Liverpool…a “Liverpudlian”, as I have since learned…and twenty-seven years later, I remain astonished by his choice to join the Navy. Why? What was it about this country that inspired him to make such a choice?
If I may be permitted to put his choice into context, joining any branch of the military at the time was an unpopular thing to do; we were then just four years out of Vietnam, and a neatly-worn uniform nearly always came with the epithet, “Baby Killer”.
I never did get to talk to him about the reasons behind his choice. I was in awe of him simply for making it.
I have since met many immigrants, most of them Filipino, who were allowed to join the Navy by virtue of winning a lottery established for the purpose of limiting their recruiting numbers. One Filipino sailor I spoke with told me that many of his countrymen joined the US military to gain their US citizenship, a goal worth tremendous sacrifice. For them, the cost of a better life is paid up front.
During one man’s security background investigation, it was discovered that though he had already been serving for a dozen years and held a lower-level security clearance, he was not a US citizen. His mother had come from Mexico to be a cook for itinerant farm workers in central California, and had brought him and his brothers and sisters here when he was very young. He was serving his country.
President Theodore Roosevelt said, “In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all…we have room but for one sole loyalty and that is loyalty to the American people.”
You didn’t hear Teddy shouting, “All right, we’ll give some land to the niggers and the chinks, but WE DON’T WANT THE IRISH.” As Americans, we should all feel welcome here. Certainly, immigrant veterans have assimilated themselves by their very service.
He also said, “We have room for but one flag, and that is the American flag…” This morning, I read this post by my friend Betty. Towards the end, she writes, “At one point, the flashlight caught the image of the tattered flag I have had hanging on my porch since September 11, 2001. Last First Date Guy gasped in horror, immediately offering to take it down for me, to buy me a new one. Very calmly, I explained that I had a brand new flag in my foyer, but that I had no intention of taking the tattered flag down.
“I hung the flag that day because I was so proud to be an American, so proud to live in a country which could rise to the occasion, process our grief in a constructive way, help each other get through the cold night aftermath. Since then, I have been dismayed at the atrocities that have followed. I am appalled by the war, by the Patriot Act, by the dismantling of our civil rights, by the greed of the oil companies. I am confused by the hypocrisy of anger following the killing of American citizens by Iraqis, while the blood is still cooling in the bodies from the bombs we dropped on the homes of countless Iraqi women and children.“My flag reflects my dismay at the performance of our current president. I have not mutilated our country's flag, Mother Earth has. She is just as dismayed as I am. The wind and the rain has wreaked identical damage to my flag as George W. Bush has done to our country. My flag will fly until January 8, 2009, when his reign will finally be over.”
It goes without saying that I don’t share many of the sentiments Betty expressed, nor do I agree with some of her more emotional statements (quite the contrary; I take personal umbrage at the assertion that we dropped bombs on “the homes of countless Iraqi women and children”), but I am very grateful that we live in a country where she can write such things without fear of reprisal, where she can display a mutilated flag as a form of protest.
There are those among you who might be astonished at how much I do agree with her. I, too, am appalled by the USA PATRIOT Act*, the corporate juggernaut of greed, and by the way the war has been conducted.
I am deeply suspicious of the current debate about immigration, and whether it is indeed about the security of our borders. Why now, nearly five years after our border policy led directly to the loss of three thousand lives? Had President Bush announced immigration reform the day after 9/11, I might have understood such an argument. Now, however, I can’t escape the parallels with German National Socialism in the early 1930s. (No, I am not comparing Mr. Bush with Adolph Hitler. The President seems merely to be reacting to public outcry on the subject, and I believe there are far more sinister players on the field.)
Having spent my entire adult life in the service of the United States, first as an active duty sailor, and later as a consultant to the US Navy, I can’t help but think of all these things on a personal level. My direct experience of immigrants has been, on the whole, overwhelmingly positive. Surely, others must feel as I do.
At the end of Batman Begins, Police Lieutenant Gordon says to Batman, “I never got to say thank you.”
Batman replies, “And you’ll never have to.”
To Betty and to all Americans, whether you feel as she does or not, I must say that I am proud to be but one of the men and women (immigrants or the descendents of immigrants all) who have, over the course of some two hundred and thirty years, earned for you the privilege of hanging a tattered flag in front of your home.
No thanks are necessary.
* The “USA PATRIOT Act” is the correct title for Public Law 107-56. “USA PATRIOT” is an acronym which stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism”.
Friday, May 26, 2006
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Belated Blogiversary
My glasses are not clean. Dr. Lori would consider this a sin, I know, so I will not tell her and I ask you to, please, keep this a secret between us. (Actually, Lori would be amused, even as she clicked her tongue at me. We began our friendship as chat room compatriots, graduated to sailing buddies, then had a standing arrangement to be each other’s New Year’s date if we were both unattached, and now she is my eye doctor. And for the record, the New Year’s thing lasted less than a year. But, I digress.)
So I am sitting here with unclean glasses, listening to the iTunes playlist entitled “mix”, but which has become my “writing mix”. I’d rename it, but that would screw up the convenient alphabetical place it currently occupies. At the moment, it is playing a very cool tune from the Kill Bill Vol. I soundtrack called “Battle Without Honor or Humanity”. This tune is so cool that when I play it in the car, I drive like a fighter pilot…the kind of guy Sihaya calls a “multi-zippered sun god”. The song makes me want to wear leather and walk in slow motion.
Aside: Is anyone else annoyed by the fact that the WB’s Pepper Dennis uses KT Tunstall’s “Black Horse & The Cherry Tree” as a theme song? Maybe they just play a snippet of it for the commercials, to send the message that this show is supposed to be hip even if it is about a dorky-but-hot chick. Which means she’s still a dork, even if she is hot. Seriously, how many variations on the “pie-in-a-pretty-girl’s-face” theme can there be?
Back from aside: I know I’m several weeks late for the traditional Blogiversary Post, as it’s been almost thirteen months since I began this blog. It began with this promise: “…I am going to document the process of dieting and exercise and self-reclamation here...and intersperse the whole thing with tales of single fatherhood, friendship, volunteerism, career headaches, growing older, girl-watching, dating, and if I'm very lucky...sex.”
How have I done with that? Have I lived up to my self-imposed obligation?
For starters, you could read everything I’ve written after that first post and not find anything about dieting and exercise. Sorry…not much of that has been going on here.
I have, however written about connecting with my daughters.
I’ve shared my thoughts on simply being friends with a woman. I confess that I am still mystified at what motivates a woman in the romance department, but these days, I am not complaining.
There have been a few posts inspired by the volunteer work I’ve done, such as this one on the cost of education, and this one on simply being the PTSA President at my daughter’s school.
I know I said I’d talk about career headaches, but really haven’t had many to speak of. There was this one, and as an update, I have to say that the guy I flame sprayed is still the same. After he was disrespectful to B in an e-mail he sent to the entire command, B’s boss suggested that he and I hold him down while B beats some sense into him.
I’ve talked some about dating, mentioning a brief crush and a number of interesting dates that didn’t lead anywhere. I’m not dating any more, having been taken off the market. Last Friday night, Sihaya said that she feels a bit like she’s cheating, that being able to read my blog gives her an unfair advantage in getting to know me. She has nothing like it to offer in return. I replied that I can be patient; that I can wait for my knowledge of her to unfold over time. I like that she has access to thoughts I had before I knew she existed, and that those thoughts make me more attractive to her.
At some point in that conversation, I made her cry – in a good way – and no, I’m not going to write about what was said. She returned the favor the next night, but then, she does have an unfair advantage.
This has been a good year – writing here and sharing my thoughts elsewhere has brought me into contact with a number of people I deeply respect and admire, none of whom would ever have been more than phantoms at the barely visible fringes of my awareness otherwise. I am intensely grateful for such friendships.
Thanks for reading.
So I am sitting here with unclean glasses, listening to the iTunes playlist entitled “mix”, but which has become my “writing mix”. I’d rename it, but that would screw up the convenient alphabetical place it currently occupies. At the moment, it is playing a very cool tune from the Kill Bill Vol. I soundtrack called “Battle Without Honor or Humanity”. This tune is so cool that when I play it in the car, I drive like a fighter pilot…the kind of guy Sihaya calls a “multi-zippered sun god”. The song makes me want to wear leather and walk in slow motion.
Aside: Is anyone else annoyed by the fact that the WB’s Pepper Dennis uses KT Tunstall’s “Black Horse & The Cherry Tree” as a theme song? Maybe they just play a snippet of it for the commercials, to send the message that this show is supposed to be hip even if it is about a dorky-but-hot chick. Which means she’s still a dork, even if she is hot. Seriously, how many variations on the “pie-in-a-pretty-girl’s-face” theme can there be?
Back from aside: I know I’m several weeks late for the traditional Blogiversary Post, as it’s been almost thirteen months since I began this blog. It began with this promise: “…I am going to document the process of dieting and exercise and self-reclamation here...and intersperse the whole thing with tales of single fatherhood, friendship, volunteerism, career headaches, growing older, girl-watching, dating, and if I'm very lucky...sex.”
How have I done with that? Have I lived up to my self-imposed obligation?
For starters, you could read everything I’ve written after that first post and not find anything about dieting and exercise. Sorry…not much of that has been going on here.
I have, however written about connecting with my daughters.
I’ve shared my thoughts on simply being friends with a woman. I confess that I am still mystified at what motivates a woman in the romance department, but these days, I am not complaining.
There have been a few posts inspired by the volunteer work I’ve done, such as this one on the cost of education, and this one on simply being the PTSA President at my daughter’s school.
I know I said I’d talk about career headaches, but really haven’t had many to speak of. There was this one, and as an update, I have to say that the guy I flame sprayed is still the same. After he was disrespectful to B in an e-mail he sent to the entire command, B’s boss suggested that he and I hold him down while B beats some sense into him.
I’ve talked some about dating, mentioning a brief crush and a number of interesting dates that didn’t lead anywhere. I’m not dating any more, having been taken off the market. Last Friday night, Sihaya said that she feels a bit like she’s cheating, that being able to read my blog gives her an unfair advantage in getting to know me. She has nothing like it to offer in return. I replied that I can be patient; that I can wait for my knowledge of her to unfold over time. I like that she has access to thoughts I had before I knew she existed, and that those thoughts make me more attractive to her.
At some point in that conversation, I made her cry – in a good way – and no, I’m not going to write about what was said. She returned the favor the next night, but then, she does have an unfair advantage.
This has been a good year – writing here and sharing my thoughts elsewhere has brought me into contact with a number of people I deeply respect and admire, none of whom would ever have been more than phantoms at the barely visible fringes of my awareness otherwise. I am intensely grateful for such friendships.
Thanks for reading.
Monday, May 22, 2006
Cats and Dogs
I'll start off with an update on Clara: My sister was given a handheld device that serves to monitor the function of Clara's pacemaker, and was concerned late last week when it appeared that the pacemaker wasn't providing any stabilizing signals to Clara's heart. She called the cardiologist, who downloaded the data (cool use of technology), and it turns out that the reason the pacemaker isn't firing is because Clara's heart is doing just fine on its own. No word on removal of the pacemaker, yet...but good news, indeed.
Here's something I couldn't avoid commenting on: Madonna's kicked off her new world tour. At $380 a ticket, I will not be going. Not that I would anyway; for the same price, I can get season tickets to the San Diego Opera, where I can be assured of three things:
1. The music will be excellent.
2. The social commentary will not include statistics.
3. The choreography won't involve giant disco balls or bare-breasted dancers with ball gags.
Item 3: "The Da Vinci Code" made $224 million over the weekend, despite middling reviews and threats of protests. Thus far, no one has seriously threatened to kill author Dan Brown for writing the novel, which illuminates a notable difference between the predominant faiths of the world. Salman Rushdie is still living with the bounty on his head for writing "The Satanic Verses".
Back to the Madonna article: Rosie O'Donnell is a "Gay Icon"? Does she still qualify for that if she ditched her spouse in the Ueker Seats to sit in the $380 seats? She couldn't spring for two seats? I wonder what the conversation was like when they got home. Did Rosie get the silent treatment for a while, and then have to sleep on the couch? Is she going to have to make it up to her spouse for the next six months? If so, she's truly a Gay Icon. If life was fair, we'd all be getting a Microsoft XP-style bubble popping up right about now that says "There are unused icons on your desktop. Would you like me to delete them?"
Annoying Bit Of The Day: Websites that redirect you to their advertisers without first allowing you access to the site you want. I don't mind seeing adverts on your pages. I mind-but-can-deal-with popups. But don't make me click the Back Button to get into the website I wanted to go to in the first place. (I'd wonder if it was just my computer being sent a virus, but it's the only website doing it.)
This just in: Oh, crap!
Here's something I couldn't avoid commenting on: Madonna's kicked off her new world tour. At $380 a ticket, I will not be going. Not that I would anyway; for the same price, I can get season tickets to the San Diego Opera, where I can be assured of three things:
1. The music will be excellent.
2. The social commentary will not include statistics.
3. The choreography won't involve giant disco balls or bare-breasted dancers with ball gags.
Item 3: "The Da Vinci Code" made $224 million over the weekend, despite middling reviews and threats of protests. Thus far, no one has seriously threatened to kill author Dan Brown for writing the novel, which illuminates a notable difference between the predominant faiths of the world. Salman Rushdie is still living with the bounty on his head for writing "The Satanic Verses".
Back to the Madonna article: Rosie O'Donnell is a "Gay Icon"? Does she still qualify for that if she ditched her spouse in the Ueker Seats to sit in the $380 seats? She couldn't spring for two seats? I wonder what the conversation was like when they got home. Did Rosie get the silent treatment for a while, and then have to sleep on the couch? Is she going to have to make it up to her spouse for the next six months? If so, she's truly a Gay Icon. If life was fair, we'd all be getting a Microsoft XP-style bubble popping up right about now that says "There are unused icons on your desktop. Would you like me to delete them?"
Annoying Bit Of The Day: Websites that redirect you to their advertisers without first allowing you access to the site you want. I don't mind seeing adverts on your pages. I mind-but-can-deal-with popups. But don't make me click the Back Button to get into the website I wanted to go to in the first place. (I'd wonder if it was just my computer being sent a virus, but it's the only website doing it.)
This just in: Oh, crap!
Friday, April 28, 2006
United 93
I wasn’t sure I wanted to see this film. In fact, until this morning, I was against it.
The review I read this morning changed my mind. Sure, there’s all the talk about the passengers of Flight 93 as heroes (they were), but what brought me to this film this afternoon was the notion that it should stand not just as a tribute film, but as a reminder of how life has changed since before 9/11.
I spotted two right away – the cavalier approach to airport security, with cursory searches of passengers entering the security area, and the hot meals being served in flight.
Much was made in the press stories about this film that the passengers of United 93 were the first to realize that everything had changed. I’m not entirely sure that’s true. By the time they were presented with their final array of choices, the World Trade Center had already been attacked, and both towers were on fire. It’s more accurate to say that United 93 was the site on which Americans first fought back.
I learned of the terrorist action at around the same time they did, when I got a phone call from the woman I was dating at the time. She often called during her commutes when the traffic was slow, but this morning, her voice was a mix of shock and anger. “Someone bombed the World Trade Center,” she said. Not, “Good morning,” but, “Someone bombed the World Trade Center.”
I had been sound asleep, and it took me a few minutes to process what she’d said. I could hear the car radio in the background, and she’d listen for a moment and relay the sketchy misinformation to me. “No one knows who, but they used airplanes. Both towers are on fire.”
At that point, I remember throwing off the covers and stomping out to the living room and turning on CNN.
I was stunned by what I saw. Instead of the burning towers of the World Trade Center I expected, I was looking at the stone edifice of a shorter building. Seconds later, a banner appeared at the bottom which read, “The Pentagon.”
Oh, fuck, I said. Oh, fuck. I gotta go, Sharon, we’re at war.
The guards at the gate to the base where I worked wore body armor and carried firearms. I’d never seen them carrying shotguns before. As the off-going duty section leader, I raced back to the security office, where everyone not monitoring traffic through the gate was riveted to Fox News.
None of us knew it yet, but United 93 had already torn a hole a 115 feet deep in a Pennsylvania field.
My relief showed up, and together we made what decisions we could about security, which weren’t many. We made sure our students went to their classrooms. And we waited.
Just before 0800 or so, Regional Security called and directed us to lock the base down. Gates on the incoming side were to be closed, no further incoming traffic was allowed, for any reason. All students and non-essential personnel were to be sent home.
My boss had been Command Duty Officer the night before, and she arrived just as they were sliding home the bolt on the gates. She was sent home. Because she was still responsible for the command, she called my cellular phone, and though I would normally have been considered non-essential, I became her arms and legs inside the fence. At least, that was the plan. There wasn’t much for either of us to do but vent our frustration and calm each other’s fears.
I called my older daughter and found her home sick from school. She’d been watching the television, totally bewildered. I told her not to worry about me, that I was okay, and that I loved her. In retrospect, I might as well have just shouted I’m scared shitless!!!! into the phone, because I don’t think she was worried until that moment.
None of us knew that morning, of course, the extent of the changes in our lives. We simply sat, dazed, and watched as the inexorable moment washed over us.
The next morning, my cubicle mate and I sent e-mails to every ship in the Pacific Fleet: “Need a Tomahawk chief?” Several ships did.
On the 15th, my cube mate and I met separately with our department head to sign our annual fitness reports. He’d gone in first, and apparently spoken of our intent to find ships to go to so that we could do our part in the war, whenever we hit back.
Then it was my turn. Before I could say more than a few words, the department head slid my fitness report across the conference table in his office and said, “Chief, I just have one question: if you both go, who can do your job while you’re gone?”
“I don’t know, sir,” I answered.
“Neither do I, Chief. You’re staying right here.”
Shit.
That afternoon, I suggested that we double the number of training exercises we ran, and for the next eight months, I worked twelve hours a day preparing ships to go to war, an effort for which I received two medals, one as an active duty sailor and the other as a civilian.
Someday, I may travel to Shanksville, Pennsylvania and bury those medals in the field alongside the passengers of United 93.
* * *
As I waited for the film to begin, I wondered about my fellow moviegoers; how many of them had anguishing personal stories to tell about that day? How many could claim some connection to the events depicted in the film?
For me, there are two more connections.
One of them is fairly direct: a friend was a United flight attendant at the time who did a schedule swap that got her out of flying aboard Flight 93 that day. It was purest luck; 93 was one of her regular flights.
The other was a strong sense of personal responsibility for the events of 9/11. I cannot explain many of my reasons for feeling this way, but for years after the attacks, I believed them to be well-founded. The release of the 9/11 Commission Report has largely changed those feelings in ways I have yet to fully explore.
There has been a great deal of debate over whether enough time has passed for us to confront the events of 9/11 through the arts. I do not believe more time should pass; I’m sorry Leroy Neiman didn’t set up his easel and do one of his speedily rendered impressionist paintings while the towers were still standing.
It doesn’t take much observation to conclude that we Americans have become even more decadent, more complacent than we were when Osama bin Laden ordered the 9/11 attacks. Go stand at any major intersection for twenty minutes and count the number of people holding cellular phones to their faces while driving.
It’s long past time.
We should have been reciting the names of the United 93 passengers who fought back every day. (We’ve got time, after all, now that we can’t say the Pledge of Allegiance.) (LeRoy Homer, CeeCee Lyles, Sandra Bradshaw, Todd Beamer, Mark Bingham, Tom Burnett, Andrew Garcia, Jeremy Glick, and Richard Guadagno are believed to be the key players in the counterattack on the cockpit.)
It is definitely long past time for heartfelt remembrance.
I keep the flag presented to me at my retirement on the book shelf in my living room. It is in a triangular display case, the only formal display of career memorabilia I’ve allowed myself. The flag was flown on September 11th, 2002, over the ship which hosted my retirement ceremony, one of two such flags flown that day. The other was given to a shipmate who was so badly burned in the attack on the Pentagon that a year later he was still wearing artificial skin on much of his body.
Long past time, indeed.
* * *
Now, the movie does contain a few deviations from the official account.
First Officer LeRoy Homer is shown to be the first man killed by the terrorists, and the pilot is also shown being stabbed to death, both during the initial struggle for control of the cockpit. The transcript of the cockpit voice recorder shows that one of the terrorists had a problem in the cockpit and asked one of his comrades to bring the pilot back to the cockpit to help. Clearly, he’d have had no reason to do so if both pilots had been killed in his line of sight.
Second, and perhaps more importantly, the film shows the passengers gaining access to the cockpit and the crash as a result of their struggling for control of the plane. Again, the CVR transcript proves this was not the case. While the passengers were futilely bashing at the door with a service cart, the two terrorists in the cockpit considered turning off the oxygen to the passenger compartment, then argued about whether or not to fly the plane into the ground to prevent the passengers from regaining control of the flight. In the end, the two terrorists rolled the plane inverted and pulled as hard as they could for the ground.
Neither of these discrepancies detract from the essence of the film, which perfectly captures the sense of shock, confusion, and powerlessness we all felt that day.
Go see it.
The review I read this morning changed my mind. Sure, there’s all the talk about the passengers of Flight 93 as heroes (they were), but what brought me to this film this afternoon was the notion that it should stand not just as a tribute film, but as a reminder of how life has changed since before 9/11.
I spotted two right away – the cavalier approach to airport security, with cursory searches of passengers entering the security area, and the hot meals being served in flight.
Much was made in the press stories about this film that the passengers of United 93 were the first to realize that everything had changed. I’m not entirely sure that’s true. By the time they were presented with their final array of choices, the World Trade Center had already been attacked, and both towers were on fire. It’s more accurate to say that United 93 was the site on which Americans first fought back.
I learned of the terrorist action at around the same time they did, when I got a phone call from the woman I was dating at the time. She often called during her commutes when the traffic was slow, but this morning, her voice was a mix of shock and anger. “Someone bombed the World Trade Center,” she said. Not, “Good morning,” but, “Someone bombed the World Trade Center.”
I had been sound asleep, and it took me a few minutes to process what she’d said. I could hear the car radio in the background, and she’d listen for a moment and relay the sketchy misinformation to me. “No one knows who, but they used airplanes. Both towers are on fire.”
At that point, I remember throwing off the covers and stomping out to the living room and turning on CNN.
I was stunned by what I saw. Instead of the burning towers of the World Trade Center I expected, I was looking at the stone edifice of a shorter building. Seconds later, a banner appeared at the bottom which read, “The Pentagon.”
Oh, fuck, I said. Oh, fuck. I gotta go, Sharon, we’re at war.
The guards at the gate to the base where I worked wore body armor and carried firearms. I’d never seen them carrying shotguns before. As the off-going duty section leader, I raced back to the security office, where everyone not monitoring traffic through the gate was riveted to Fox News.
None of us knew it yet, but United 93 had already torn a hole a 115 feet deep in a Pennsylvania field.
My relief showed up, and together we made what decisions we could about security, which weren’t many. We made sure our students went to their classrooms. And we waited.
Just before 0800 or so, Regional Security called and directed us to lock the base down. Gates on the incoming side were to be closed, no further incoming traffic was allowed, for any reason. All students and non-essential personnel were to be sent home.
My boss had been Command Duty Officer the night before, and she arrived just as they were sliding home the bolt on the gates. She was sent home. Because she was still responsible for the command, she called my cellular phone, and though I would normally have been considered non-essential, I became her arms and legs inside the fence. At least, that was the plan. There wasn’t much for either of us to do but vent our frustration and calm each other’s fears.
I called my older daughter and found her home sick from school. She’d been watching the television, totally bewildered. I told her not to worry about me, that I was okay, and that I loved her. In retrospect, I might as well have just shouted I’m scared shitless!!!! into the phone, because I don’t think she was worried until that moment.
None of us knew that morning, of course, the extent of the changes in our lives. We simply sat, dazed, and watched as the inexorable moment washed over us.
The next morning, my cubicle mate and I sent e-mails to every ship in the Pacific Fleet: “Need a Tomahawk chief?” Several ships did.
On the 15th, my cube mate and I met separately with our department head to sign our annual fitness reports. He’d gone in first, and apparently spoken of our intent to find ships to go to so that we could do our part in the war, whenever we hit back.
Then it was my turn. Before I could say more than a few words, the department head slid my fitness report across the conference table in his office and said, “Chief, I just have one question: if you both go, who can do your job while you’re gone?”
“I don’t know, sir,” I answered.
“Neither do I, Chief. You’re staying right here.”
Shit.
That afternoon, I suggested that we double the number of training exercises we ran, and for the next eight months, I worked twelve hours a day preparing ships to go to war, an effort for which I received two medals, one as an active duty sailor and the other as a civilian.
Someday, I may travel to Shanksville, Pennsylvania and bury those medals in the field alongside the passengers of United 93.
* * *
As I waited for the film to begin, I wondered about my fellow moviegoers; how many of them had anguishing personal stories to tell about that day? How many could claim some connection to the events depicted in the film?
For me, there are two more connections.
One of them is fairly direct: a friend was a United flight attendant at the time who did a schedule swap that got her out of flying aboard Flight 93 that day. It was purest luck; 93 was one of her regular flights.
The other was a strong sense of personal responsibility for the events of 9/11. I cannot explain many of my reasons for feeling this way, but for years after the attacks, I believed them to be well-founded. The release of the 9/11 Commission Report has largely changed those feelings in ways I have yet to fully explore.
There has been a great deal of debate over whether enough time has passed for us to confront the events of 9/11 through the arts. I do not believe more time should pass; I’m sorry Leroy Neiman didn’t set up his easel and do one of his speedily rendered impressionist paintings while the towers were still standing.
It doesn’t take much observation to conclude that we Americans have become even more decadent, more complacent than we were when Osama bin Laden ordered the 9/11 attacks. Go stand at any major intersection for twenty minutes and count the number of people holding cellular phones to their faces while driving.
It’s long past time.
We should have been reciting the names of the United 93 passengers who fought back every day. (We’ve got time, after all, now that we can’t say the Pledge of Allegiance.) (LeRoy Homer, CeeCee Lyles, Sandra Bradshaw, Todd Beamer, Mark Bingham, Tom Burnett, Andrew Garcia, Jeremy Glick, and Richard Guadagno are believed to be the key players in the counterattack on the cockpit.)
It is definitely long past time for heartfelt remembrance.
I keep the flag presented to me at my retirement on the book shelf in my living room. It is in a triangular display case, the only formal display of career memorabilia I’ve allowed myself. The flag was flown on September 11th, 2002, over the ship which hosted my retirement ceremony, one of two such flags flown that day. The other was given to a shipmate who was so badly burned in the attack on the Pentagon that a year later he was still wearing artificial skin on much of his body.
Long past time, indeed.
* * *
Now, the movie does contain a few deviations from the official account.
First Officer LeRoy Homer is shown to be the first man killed by the terrorists, and the pilot is also shown being stabbed to death, both during the initial struggle for control of the cockpit. The transcript of the cockpit voice recorder shows that one of the terrorists had a problem in the cockpit and asked one of his comrades to bring the pilot back to the cockpit to help. Clearly, he’d have had no reason to do so if both pilots had been killed in his line of sight.
Second, and perhaps more importantly, the film shows the passengers gaining access to the cockpit and the crash as a result of their struggling for control of the plane. Again, the CVR transcript proves this was not the case. While the passengers were futilely bashing at the door with a service cart, the two terrorists in the cockpit considered turning off the oxygen to the passenger compartment, then argued about whether or not to fly the plane into the ground to prevent the passengers from regaining control of the flight. In the end, the two terrorists rolled the plane inverted and pulled as hard as they could for the ground.
Neither of these discrepancies detract from the essence of the film, which perfectly captures the sense of shock, confusion, and powerlessness we all felt that day.
Go see it.
Monday, April 24, 2006
Seeing Stars
It was a dark and stormless night. That part of the sky that was unblocked by the mountains among which our little valley nestled itself was, well, luminous. There was no moon; all the light by which I could see the shape of my car, the curve of the top of our tent, the lumpy shapes of the rocks, and the grasping branches of the scrubby tree I stood near came from the stars.
If you’ve never been where you can see by starlight, you haven’t lived.
For a moment, gazing up in awe at the early Sunday sky from our camp in the Blair Valley, I considered waking Sihaya…a gentle whisper beckoning her to join me in a few moments of the sublime.
In a minute, I thought. I’ll get us a bottle of water to share.
I cringed when I unlocked the car, the silent blinker-flash and the fading-in of the interior lights trod heavily on the stars. I pulled out two bottles of water and gently closed the trunk.
Twisting the top off one bottle, and tipping it up, I took in more of the sky. Yes, I thought. Sihaya will love this.
The breeze that had so whipped the camp fire during our earlier revelry had died; in its place was only silence. Even the coyotes seemed to be sleeping.
And. then. she. snored.
It’s a gentle sound, and one I find endearing, though I have not yet convinced her of this. Perhaps I will, someday.
Standing in the flawlessness of the predawn desert, holding one and a half bottles of water, I decide to let Sihaya sleep.
In that moment, I know that she would love to come see the sky with me. I am certain of it: next to the case of water in my car, there are two books on astronomy that she brought as an afterthought, in case we should have a moment to give to the sky together.
I love her for thinking of such things.
And I love the sound of her snoring.
If you’ve never been where you can see by starlight, you haven’t lived.
For a moment, gazing up in awe at the early Sunday sky from our camp in the Blair Valley, I considered waking Sihaya…a gentle whisper beckoning her to join me in a few moments of the sublime.
In a minute, I thought. I’ll get us a bottle of water to share.
I cringed when I unlocked the car, the silent blinker-flash and the fading-in of the interior lights trod heavily on the stars. I pulled out two bottles of water and gently closed the trunk.
Twisting the top off one bottle, and tipping it up, I took in more of the sky. Yes, I thought. Sihaya will love this.
The breeze that had so whipped the camp fire during our earlier revelry had died; in its place was only silence. Even the coyotes seemed to be sleeping.
And. then. she. snored.
It’s a gentle sound, and one I find endearing, though I have not yet convinced her of this. Perhaps I will, someday.
Standing in the flawlessness of the predawn desert, holding one and a half bottles of water, I decide to let Sihaya sleep.
In that moment, I know that she would love to come see the sky with me. I am certain of it: next to the case of water in my car, there are two books on astronomy that she brought as an afterthought, in case we should have a moment to give to the sky together.
I love her for thinking of such things.
And I love the sound of her snoring.
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Something To Talk About
There’s an e-mail going around the Internet that includes pictures of some California high school students protesting the Immigration Reform Bill by hauling down the Stars and Stripes at their school, turning it upside down and hoisting it below the Mexican flag. The e-mail suggests that recipients of the e-mail should help defend America’s sovereignty by forwarding the e-mail and the pictures to “every English speaking person” in their address book.
I submit that doing so only broadens the audience of the original “protesters”, and inflames emotions…something that we ought to avoid.
I've never found the practice of Free Speech disgusting or objectionable, even when I find the method or content of a message to be repugnant. Make no mistake, I think that displaying Old Glory upside down for any other reason than as a distress signal is disrespectful. Burning one that has not been soiled is repugnant. But I also think that such things are protected under the First Amendment, and that anyone who resorts to such means of protest is only reaffirming the true meaning and value of the flag.
Of course, that’s just my opinion, and I fully respect the right of every American to disagree.
I’ll get back to my point.
At my daughter's high school, students walked out of class to protest the Immigration Bill, prompting the school administration to put together a formal discussion of the issues at stake, and two teachers volunteered their time to facilitate the discussion. Very few students attended; as my daughter pointed out, it's more fun to practice civil disobedience with your friends than it is to learn the facts about the issue.
A wise young woman, she is. I agree. I’m continually amazed by the number of people who will argue someone else’s point as though it was their own, without taking the time or trouble to form their own opinion.
So, to help foster an educated debate, here’s the summary of the bill.
If you'd like to know more about the current policies of the US Government regarding citizenship and immigration, go here: http://uscis.gov/graphics/index.htm
Now, armed with some understanding, I'd like to ask these questions of those who oppose measures to reform our immigration law:
1) What do you suggest as an alternate method to prevent identity theft by undocumented immigrants? Or by those seeking to profit from undocumented immigrants?
2) If you're opposed to stiffer penalties for the smuggling of human beings, what do you suggest as an alternate method to curtail the exploitation of economically disadvantaged aliens seeking a better life here?
For those in favor of immigration reform, I have these questions:
1) Are you comfortable with being required to keep (and possibly carry) a machine-readable identity card that proves your citizenship?
2) Are you ready to be required to present proof of employment eligibility every time you apply for a new job?
3) Is it okay with you that this bill offers no restrictions against the use of any information gathered for the national employment eligibility verification system by anyone, including the government itself?
Free Speech is a good thing, and always has been. It's what we, as a nation, are all about.
Wouldn’t it be nice if we knew what we were talking about?
I submit that doing so only broadens the audience of the original “protesters”, and inflames emotions…something that we ought to avoid.
I've never found the practice of Free Speech disgusting or objectionable, even when I find the method or content of a message to be repugnant. Make no mistake, I think that displaying Old Glory upside down for any other reason than as a distress signal is disrespectful. Burning one that has not been soiled is repugnant. But I also think that such things are protected under the First Amendment, and that anyone who resorts to such means of protest is only reaffirming the true meaning and value of the flag.
Of course, that’s just my opinion, and I fully respect the right of every American to disagree.
I’ll get back to my point.
At my daughter's high school, students walked out of class to protest the Immigration Bill, prompting the school administration to put together a formal discussion of the issues at stake, and two teachers volunteered their time to facilitate the discussion. Very few students attended; as my daughter pointed out, it's more fun to practice civil disobedience with your friends than it is to learn the facts about the issue.
A wise young woman, she is. I agree. I’m continually amazed by the number of people who will argue someone else’s point as though it was their own, without taking the time or trouble to form their own opinion.
So, to help foster an educated debate, here’s the summary of the bill.
If you'd like to know more about the current policies of the US Government regarding citizenship and immigration, go here: http://uscis.gov/graphics/index.htm
Now, armed with some understanding, I'd like to ask these questions of those who oppose measures to reform our immigration law:
1) What do you suggest as an alternate method to prevent identity theft by undocumented immigrants? Or by those seeking to profit from undocumented immigrants?
2) If you're opposed to stiffer penalties for the smuggling of human beings, what do you suggest as an alternate method to curtail the exploitation of economically disadvantaged aliens seeking a better life here?
For those in favor of immigration reform, I have these questions:
1) Are you comfortable with being required to keep (and possibly carry) a machine-readable identity card that proves your citizenship?
2) Are you ready to be required to present proof of employment eligibility every time you apply for a new job?
3) Is it okay with you that this bill offers no restrictions against the use of any information gathered for the national employment eligibility verification system by anyone, including the government itself?
Free Speech is a good thing, and always has been. It's what we, as a nation, are all about.
Wouldn’t it be nice if we knew what we were talking about?
Saturday, April 15, 2006
Update
Clara is doing very well…not quite out of the woods, but her pacemaker is doing the job it was put there for.
If her progress continues as it has been for the last couple days, she’ll be coming home at the end of next week!
Thank you all for your continuing prayers!
If her progress continues as it has been for the last couple days, she’ll be coming home at the end of next week!
Thank you all for your continuing prayers!
Thursday, April 13, 2006
Decrazed
I made myself crazy one afternoon last week.
I could see it happening, and dagnabbit, I felt powerless to stop it.
I second-guessed myself into a snit.
I had suggested to Sihaya that we spend an evening in rather than out, and did so late in the day, by e-mail. When she didn’t respond right away, I began to wonder if I’d been too forward. What if she thinks I’m suggesting we have sex, and she’s not ready for that? I’m not suggesting that, but does she know me well enough yet to know that?
You get the idea.
So, I wrote another e-mail, apologizing and assuring her of my gentlemanly intent. Thankfully, she was patient with me.
Note to self: Sihaya isn’t going to do anything she doesn’t want to do, and she’ll suggest we do something else if she’s not comfortable.
Note to self (Part II): Stop being a bonehead.
All of this offers me an excellent opportunity to look at my feelings about relationships. I want one. (That’s a good thing, since it appears that I am in one.)
The truth is that for the first time in quite a while, I find myself in the presence of an attractive woman who not only finds me desirable on several levels, but also actively seeks out my company.
I’m scared shitless.
Not because I’m afraid of having Sihaya want me, but of having her not want me. And that fear can, if I let it, unman me, as Shakespeare would have put it.
Not an attractive quality.
I’m paying attention here: Sihaya knows who she is and what she wants. She’s thoughtful and kind and considerate and direct. She’s not at all afraid to speak her mind. I need to trust her.
She seems to trust me. And more than that, she trusts herself.
Note to self (Part III): I can trust her, too.
I could see it happening, and dagnabbit, I felt powerless to stop it.
I second-guessed myself into a snit.
I had suggested to Sihaya that we spend an evening in rather than out, and did so late in the day, by e-mail. When she didn’t respond right away, I began to wonder if I’d been too forward. What if she thinks I’m suggesting we have sex, and she’s not ready for that? I’m not suggesting that, but does she know me well enough yet to know that?
You get the idea.
So, I wrote another e-mail, apologizing and assuring her of my gentlemanly intent. Thankfully, she was patient with me.
Note to self: Sihaya isn’t going to do anything she doesn’t want to do, and she’ll suggest we do something else if she’s not comfortable.
Note to self (Part II): Stop being a bonehead.
All of this offers me an excellent opportunity to look at my feelings about relationships. I want one. (That’s a good thing, since it appears that I am in one.)
The truth is that for the first time in quite a while, I find myself in the presence of an attractive woman who not only finds me desirable on several levels, but also actively seeks out my company.
I’m scared shitless.
Not because I’m afraid of having Sihaya want me, but of having her not want me. And that fear can, if I let it, unman me, as Shakespeare would have put it.
Not an attractive quality.
I’m paying attention here: Sihaya knows who she is and what she wants. She’s thoughtful and kind and considerate and direct. She’s not at all afraid to speak her mind. I need to trust her.
She seems to trust me. And more than that, she trusts herself.
Note to self (Part III): I can trust her, too.
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Prayers Again, Please
Clara is in surgery; the doctors are inserting a pacemaker.
Update: She's through the surgery, and the surgeons were pleased with how well she did. She's a little fighter.
The reason for the pacemaker is the ongoing arrythmia; the doctors had hoped that it would correct itself within a few days, but no such luck. The arrythmia may be caused by the allegedly benign tumors growing on Clara's heart (one manifestation of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex), but (and I'm speculating here) may also be caused by the allegedly benign tumors in her brain. Operating on an infant's heart must be a difficult proposition, since it's about the size of a walnut. The tumors must be truly tiny. And if the arrythmia is caused by the brain tumors, there's almost no point in removing the heart tumors...it'd be an extremely dangerous procedure with no payoff.
Of course, the presence of the pacemaker means that the MRI to look at the brain tumors won't happen, so whatever is happening in her head will be that much harder to diagnose.
Still in the woods.
Update: She's through the surgery, and the surgeons were pleased with how well she did. She's a little fighter.
The reason for the pacemaker is the ongoing arrythmia; the doctors had hoped that it would correct itself within a few days, but no such luck. The arrythmia may be caused by the allegedly benign tumors growing on Clara's heart (one manifestation of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex), but (and I'm speculating here) may also be caused by the allegedly benign tumors in her brain. Operating on an infant's heart must be a difficult proposition, since it's about the size of a walnut. The tumors must be truly tiny. And if the arrythmia is caused by the brain tumors, there's almost no point in removing the heart tumors...it'd be an extremely dangerous procedure with no payoff.
Of course, the presence of the pacemaker means that the MRI to look at the brain tumors won't happen, so whatever is happening in her head will be that much harder to diagnose.
Still in the woods.
Saturday, April 08, 2006
Since You Asked...
What did I say? I thought I might borrow a few words from Mr. Darcy:
"Would you do me the honor of becoming my wife?"
Trivia question: What was Mr. Darcy's first name?
Check out the link to the right...Clara Jane's pictures.
"Would you do me the honor of becoming my wife?"
Trivia question: What was Mr. Darcy's first name?
Check out the link to the right...Clara Jane's pictures.
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
So, I've Already Proposed
It began with a simple post on Craig’s List:
“So, Here's The Thing...I'm not looking for the classic "babelicious babe"...I really don't care about that. What I want most is creative, smart, funny (and let's face it....sane).
A little about me: I am divorced, with two kids, one of whom lives with me most of the time and the other with their mother. I'm creative, smart, and funny (and reasonably sane), and my friends tell me they appreciate my integrity. I'm respectful and emotionally generous. Most of the women I know tell me that I'm sweet. My kids will tell you I'm a good father, unless you catch them when I'm on their case about something, usually grades. Having served for 23 years in the Navy, I understand the nature of commitment, and somewhere around here, I have the remnants of some of the self-discipline I picked up during my time in the service.”
I got two responses.
The first was from a woman who admitted that she smokes. Thank you, no, even if you’re trying to quit.
The second got my attention for two reasons: She was writing from work at noon on a Sunday, but cautioned me not to expect a response until Monday if I wrote back, and she asked for a response whether I was interested or not. “I can handle rejection,” she wrote, “and would definitely want to know!”
We wrote for a few days, and by Wednesday I had her number. (“You like apples? I got her numbah. How you like THEM apples?”) Our first conversation consisted of a lot of laughter, plans for Saturday morning coffee, and ended with “good night,” instead of “bye”.
Coffee on Saturday lasted four and a half hours, and included lunch and an hour of playing in the toy store. It turns out that she is creative and funny and very, very smart. Inside an hour, I knew I wanted to kiss her. An hour or so after that, I was pretty sure she wouldn’t mind if I did. It turned out that I was right.
Part of the conversation was about Frank Herbert’s Dune, and partly for that reason, I’m calling her Sihaya.
I called her the next night. I hate the Three Day Rule. Usually, I follow it anyway, but not with this girl.
Last Saturday afternoon, I went to see her dance at the Renaissance Faire…she performs Middle Eastern dance with a troupe (the other reason she’ll be called Sihaya here, since the girl in Dune was a woman of the desert). Before her performance, we walked around to see the sights at the faire, and as we came out of one stall, we had to wait for the Queen and her royal entourage. As they passed, I bowed and Sihaya curtseyed.
The Queen stopped. “And who do we have here before us?” she asked, grandly and not unpleasantly.
I introduced Sihaya, and gave my own name.
The Queen asked who we are to each other. I looked at Sihaya, who grinned at me. “We are dating, Your Highness,” said I.
“And how long have you been thus?” asked the Queen.
Another grin from Sihaya, and I returned it. “About a week,” I replied.
“In that case,” said the Queen, “We have a game for the two of you.” She bade us stand in front of her, and face each other. “We wish you to imagine a time in the future. Perhaps it will be five years. Perhaps it will be two. But, Kurt, We would give you a glimpse into this future time, when on one knee, you ask this beautiful lady for her hand in marriage. So that is the game We have for you…to ask this wonderful lady to marry you, and to do so in a way that she cannot say aught but yes.”
And so, I did. And she did.
“So, Here's The Thing...I'm not looking for the classic "babelicious babe"...I really don't care about that. What I want most is creative, smart, funny (and let's face it....sane).
A little about me: I am divorced, with two kids, one of whom lives with me most of the time and the other with their mother. I'm creative, smart, and funny (and reasonably sane), and my friends tell me they appreciate my integrity. I'm respectful and emotionally generous. Most of the women I know tell me that I'm sweet. My kids will tell you I'm a good father, unless you catch them when I'm on their case about something, usually grades. Having served for 23 years in the Navy, I understand the nature of commitment, and somewhere around here, I have the remnants of some of the self-discipline I picked up during my time in the service.”
I got two responses.
The first was from a woman who admitted that she smokes. Thank you, no, even if you’re trying to quit.
The second got my attention for two reasons: She was writing from work at noon on a Sunday, but cautioned me not to expect a response until Monday if I wrote back, and she asked for a response whether I was interested or not. “I can handle rejection,” she wrote, “and would definitely want to know!”
We wrote for a few days, and by Wednesday I had her number. (“You like apples? I got her numbah. How you like THEM apples?”) Our first conversation consisted of a lot of laughter, plans for Saturday morning coffee, and ended with “good night,” instead of “bye”.
Coffee on Saturday lasted four and a half hours, and included lunch and an hour of playing in the toy store. It turns out that she is creative and funny and very, very smart. Inside an hour, I knew I wanted to kiss her. An hour or so after that, I was pretty sure she wouldn’t mind if I did. It turned out that I was right.
Part of the conversation was about Frank Herbert’s Dune, and partly for that reason, I’m calling her Sihaya.
I called her the next night. I hate the Three Day Rule. Usually, I follow it anyway, but not with this girl.
Last Saturday afternoon, I went to see her dance at the Renaissance Faire…she performs Middle Eastern dance with a troupe (the other reason she’ll be called Sihaya here, since the girl in Dune was a woman of the desert). Before her performance, we walked around to see the sights at the faire, and as we came out of one stall, we had to wait for the Queen and her royal entourage. As they passed, I bowed and Sihaya curtseyed.
The Queen stopped. “And who do we have here before us?” she asked, grandly and not unpleasantly.
I introduced Sihaya, and gave my own name.
The Queen asked who we are to each other. I looked at Sihaya, who grinned at me. “We are dating, Your Highness,” said I.
“And how long have you been thus?” asked the Queen.
Another grin from Sihaya, and I returned it. “About a week,” I replied.
“In that case,” said the Queen, “We have a game for the two of you.” She bade us stand in front of her, and face each other. “We wish you to imagine a time in the future. Perhaps it will be five years. Perhaps it will be two. But, Kurt, We would give you a glimpse into this future time, when on one knee, you ask this beautiful lady for her hand in marriage. So that is the game We have for you…to ask this wonderful lady to marry you, and to do so in a way that she cannot say aught but yes.”
And so, I did. And she did.
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
She's Here!
Thank you all so much for your prayers!
Clara Jane was born last night at 7:42 pm, at 7 lbs 11 oz, and 19 ½ inches. She has long black hair, just like her mother did when she was born. The cardiac arrhythmia continued after she was born, so they whisked her off to the NICU right away, but when I saw her she was pink as pink can be, and working a pacifier as hard as she could. There was a brief incident during the night when her heart was beating more rapidly than the doctors would prefer, but when I talked to my brother-in-law this morning, Clara was stable and doing fine. She’s not out of the woods yet, but she’s doing about as well as can be expected.
When the doctor came in to take my sister up to surgery, he looked at the fetal monitor trace and said, “Hmmm…you’ve been having some pretty good contractions there. We’d have had a baby tonight, either way!”
So, I’m back at home…my parents got in last night and it was about to get crowded enough that I’d have just been in the way. I’ll go back up on the weekend and help with all the stuff they weren’t able to get done this week because the baby came early.
Thanks, again, so very very much, for all your prayers and thoughts. I know they made a difference.
Clara Jane was born last night at 7:42 pm, at 7 lbs 11 oz, and 19 ½ inches. She has long black hair, just like her mother did when she was born. The cardiac arrhythmia continued after she was born, so they whisked her off to the NICU right away, but when I saw her she was pink as pink can be, and working a pacifier as hard as she could. There was a brief incident during the night when her heart was beating more rapidly than the doctors would prefer, but when I talked to my brother-in-law this morning, Clara was stable and doing fine. She’s not out of the woods yet, but she’s doing about as well as can be expected.
When the doctor came in to take my sister up to surgery, he looked at the fetal monitor trace and said, “Hmmm…you’ve been having some pretty good contractions there. We’d have had a baby tonight, either way!”
So, I’m back at home…my parents got in last night and it was about to get crowded enough that I’d have just been in the way. I’ll go back up on the weekend and help with all the stuff they weren’t able to get done this week because the baby came early.
Thanks, again, so very very much, for all your prayers and thoughts. I know they made a difference.
Monday, April 03, 2006
Please Pray
I just got the call from my sister...the cardiac arrhythmia that the pediatricians were concerned about has happened, and she's scheduled for C-section this afternoon at 4 o'clock. We don't know much yet, and won't until Clara is born, but please, please pray.
Sunday, April 02, 2006
Well Met
Got together with a friend this afternoon…a friend I’d never actually met. Ramblin’ Girl was in town for a friend’s wedding, so we met up for a drink in the airport lounge while she was waiting for her flight.
It turns out she’s even cooler in person than her blog would lead one to believe, which basically means she’s really cool: smart, funny, easy to talk to, and cute.
On my way to the airport, I cursed myself for not having a good digital camera, because these kinds of meetings deserve pictures. When we met up, I forgot to ask if she had one with her, and the conversation ranged for a while in several directions, so neither of us thought of it…thus, sadly, I must report that there are no pictures of this Truly Historic Event.
Spending part of an afternoon with RG made me think again about how lucky I am to have such friends, and the often convoluted paths that cross in unexpected ways. I am happier with my life than I’ve been in many years, and friendships such as this one are part of the key.
It turns out she’s even cooler in person than her blog would lead one to believe, which basically means she’s really cool: smart, funny, easy to talk to, and cute.
On my way to the airport, I cursed myself for not having a good digital camera, because these kinds of meetings deserve pictures. When we met up, I forgot to ask if she had one with her, and the conversation ranged for a while in several directions, so neither of us thought of it…thus, sadly, I must report that there are no pictures of this Truly Historic Event.
Spending part of an afternoon with RG made me think again about how lucky I am to have such friends, and the often convoluted paths that cross in unexpected ways. I am happier with my life than I’ve been in many years, and friendships such as this one are part of the key.
Thursday, March 30, 2006
It's In Our Nature
As I write this, Nature is literally tapping at my window, in the form of a starling who thinks that his reflection in the mirrored glass is another male encroaching on his territory. He flies up and pecks at the window tappy-tap-ta-ta-tappy-tap then rushes back to make sure his family and nest are safe before making another run on his equally aggressive reflection.
This has been going on all week, and I suspect that the eggs have hatched now, because today, there is a female starling joining him at the window from time to time.
The mating pair of hawks has also returned to our hillside, as they do most every year. This year, one of them is trailing a sort of string from one of its legs, and I wonder if it wasn't here last year because it was in captivity. Three years ago, the pair had two little ones, and year before last, the yearlings could be seen hunting with their parents in the afternoons.
Most often, the smaller birds harass the hawks without mercy, for this week, the starlings are entirely consumed by the perceived threat from non-existent members of their own species, and the hawks are enjoying the freedom to swoop down to the corner and pick up a fresh rabbit or squirrel without an entourage.
The reason the starlings haunt the hawks is because the bigger birds don't seem to have any scruples regarding the raiding of nests.
(I imagine that this is the sort of conversation they might have, if I can be permitted a small amount of anthropomorphization:
He Hawk: "Hmmm. I'm feeling a mite peckish, Portia. I could do with a snack, perhaps a little chickie-morsel? Do we have anything in the scrub-pine to munch on?"
She Hawk: "See for yourself.")
All of this makes me think about how sometimes our instincts can fail us. We get so focused on something inconsequential that we ignore the really important stuff close at hand.
Tap, tap.
This has been going on all week, and I suspect that the eggs have hatched now, because today, there is a female starling joining him at the window from time to time.
The mating pair of hawks has also returned to our hillside, as they do most every year. This year, one of them is trailing a sort of string from one of its legs, and I wonder if it wasn't here last year because it was in captivity. Three years ago, the pair had two little ones, and year before last, the yearlings could be seen hunting with their parents in the afternoons.
Most often, the smaller birds harass the hawks without mercy, for this week, the starlings are entirely consumed by the perceived threat from non-existent members of their own species, and the hawks are enjoying the freedom to swoop down to the corner and pick up a fresh rabbit or squirrel without an entourage.
The reason the starlings haunt the hawks is because the bigger birds don't seem to have any scruples regarding the raiding of nests.
(I imagine that this is the sort of conversation they might have, if I can be permitted a small amount of anthropomorphization:
He Hawk: "Hmmm. I'm feeling a mite peckish, Portia. I could do with a snack, perhaps a little chickie-morsel? Do we have anything in the scrub-pine to munch on?"
She Hawk: "See for yourself.")
All of this makes me think about how sometimes our instincts can fail us. We get so focused on something inconsequential that we ignore the really important stuff close at hand.
Tap, tap.
Monday, March 27, 2006
Catching Up
Yep. Been away a while. Can’t say that I haven’t missed writing…just haven’t had much to say. I’ve sat down a few times, but if I can be permitted a vulgar analogy, I’ve been afflicted with a kind of literary constipation.
After taking a moment to arrange a bit of music to write by, I’m ready – at last – to set down a few thoughts, paced by the tapping of my toe.
As if I have any.
Thoughts, that is.
What is it with people these days? According to an article on the news page at imdb.com, Morgan Spurlock (Oscar-nominated documentarian responsible for Super Size Me) delivered an over-the-top lecture at a Pennsylvania high school, mocking special education students and teachers. Apparently, his talk included the use of the F-bomb. Now, I’m a sailor, and the use of the F-bomb generally doesn’t offend me…unless I’m in the presence of someone who will be offended by it. I’m a big fan of language, and let’s face it, fuck is a word, and pretty useful one, at that. What offends me about this, if it’s true, is the mocking. Spurlock later said that he couldn’t understand the unfavorable reaction on the part of the school, saying, “The greatest lesson those kids learned today was the importance of free speech.”
Dude, it was a health fair. You were there to talk about the risks of eating too much fast food. How do jokes about pot-smoking teachers tie in, here? Right. They don’t.
And since when does spouting crap in public teach anyone about the importance of free speech? Not to be contrary, here, but all Spurlock actually did was teach his audience that free speech exists, something they probably already knew.
If you want to teach a lesson on the importance of free speech, ditch the disrespect and start talking about Abdul Rahman, the man facing the death penalty in Afghanistan for converting to Christianity.
I know, I got off on a tangent there.
In other news, my sister’s baby seems to be doing well. There is still concern, and after her last ultrasound, the doctor made the decision to move her delivery to a hospital with a better-equipped NICU, in case there are complications. (As if tumors on her heart and in her brain aren’t complications enough.) My sister reports that the baby is very active, though she hasn’t yet turned head-down in preparation for being born…so, in yet another challenge, she’s slated for a C-section on April 7th. I’m headed up to LA that day to join the crowd in the waiting room.
I’ll also be joining them on the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance Walk for the Cure on June 25th…they have a website set up for sponsorship donations, and if you feel inclined, check it out: http://www.firstgiving.com/clarajane.
And as one last bit…I’ll point you to one of my very early posts. Shortly before I wrote that post, my hairdresser tut-tutted over my soft-but-thinning locks and remarked, “You know…you might consider just shaving it all off.” I must say that over the last ten months, I’ve uncorked every excuse in the book not to shave my head, and even rebelled by not cutting my hair at all for nigh on to five months. I let myself get – as my buddy Bear put it – scruffy-lookin’.
Last Sunday, I took the plunge. It actually looks pretty good. I’ll offer a photo as soon as I have one.
After taking a moment to arrange a bit of music to write by, I’m ready – at last – to set down a few thoughts, paced by the tapping of my toe.
As if I have any.
Thoughts, that is.
What is it with people these days? According to an article on the news page at imdb.com, Morgan Spurlock (Oscar-nominated documentarian responsible for Super Size Me) delivered an over-the-top lecture at a Pennsylvania high school, mocking special education students and teachers. Apparently, his talk included the use of the F-bomb. Now, I’m a sailor, and the use of the F-bomb generally doesn’t offend me…unless I’m in the presence of someone who will be offended by it. I’m a big fan of language, and let’s face it, fuck is a word, and pretty useful one, at that. What offends me about this, if it’s true, is the mocking. Spurlock later said that he couldn’t understand the unfavorable reaction on the part of the school, saying, “The greatest lesson those kids learned today was the importance of free speech.”
Dude, it was a health fair. You were there to talk about the risks of eating too much fast food. How do jokes about pot-smoking teachers tie in, here? Right. They don’t.
And since when does spouting crap in public teach anyone about the importance of free speech? Not to be contrary, here, but all Spurlock actually did was teach his audience that free speech exists, something they probably already knew.
If you want to teach a lesson on the importance of free speech, ditch the disrespect and start talking about Abdul Rahman, the man facing the death penalty in Afghanistan for converting to Christianity.
I know, I got off on a tangent there.
In other news, my sister’s baby seems to be doing well. There is still concern, and after her last ultrasound, the doctor made the decision to move her delivery to a hospital with a better-equipped NICU, in case there are complications. (As if tumors on her heart and in her brain aren’t complications enough.) My sister reports that the baby is very active, though she hasn’t yet turned head-down in preparation for being born…so, in yet another challenge, she’s slated for a C-section on April 7th. I’m headed up to LA that day to join the crowd in the waiting room.
I’ll also be joining them on the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance Walk for the Cure on June 25th…they have a website set up for sponsorship donations, and if you feel inclined, check it out: http://www.firstgiving.com/clarajane.
And as one last bit…I’ll point you to one of my very early posts. Shortly before I wrote that post, my hairdresser tut-tutted over my soft-but-thinning locks and remarked, “You know…you might consider just shaving it all off.” I must say that over the last ten months, I’ve uncorked every excuse in the book not to shave my head, and even rebelled by not cutting my hair at all for nigh on to five months. I let myself get – as my buddy Bear put it – scruffy-lookin’.
Last Sunday, I took the plunge. It actually looks pretty good. I’ll offer a photo as soon as I have one.
Monday, March 13, 2006
Inaccessible.
I have been taking a pseudo-break from blogging. You may have noticed.
Actually, I’ve been taking a break from most forms of writing. I’m not sure why. There haven’t been many things on my mind that have seemed worthy of throwing out there for the sake of whatever flavor of posterity comes as a side dish when the entrée is Blog.
I have felt mostly like retreating from the world, of late. I am not unhappy…far from it…but I simply have not felt like I have the energy to extend myself and deal with other people.
Part of it stems, I’m sure, from the realization that I’m still carrying around quite a lot of anger, which manifests itself primarily as self-abuse in the form of bad eating habits. I have also been quite a bit shorter with people than I like – also rooted in anger.
So, fat and unpleasant to be around, I’ve taken to being a bit reclusive: I’ve ignored voice mail from friends, failed to call when I said I would, blown off e-mails, brought my noise-canceling headphones to work, retreated to the virtual world of Microsoft Flight Simulator (where lately, I have been flying a model of a World War II-era fighter plane – with its virtual guns disabled…paging Dr. Freud, Dr. Howard, Dr. Fine, Dr. Howard!), and have started to learn to swear in Mandarin. (青蛙操的流氓) You probably don’t want to know what that means – and part of the joy of swearing in a language no one understands is…that no one understands.
The funny part of all this (and that’s not to say that learning to swear in a foreign language just for the sake being able to do so isn’t funny), is that I’m actually not depressed. I’m quite content with my life, which is, on the whole, pretty effing good. I am healthy (more or less – aside from my weight), I make a good living doing a job I love, and despite being solitary (a term I prefer to “single”), I’m not unmanageably lonely.
You know that feeling you get when you’re in the midst of something, feeling in the groove, and you’re surprised to find that you’re bleeding, but you have no idea when it happened or how? It isn’t particularly painful, or you’d have noticed the injury right away, but you need to stop and tend to it…and then you don’t quite feel safe any more, doing what you were doing.
That’s how I feel right now.
What’s bleeding? Certainly not my heart, which you’ll know from reading my last post. I’m not sure.
I do know that I’ve become aware of the perception people seem to have that I am damaged. And not just me…but the women I seem to be attracting. Not all of the women who’ve found me attractive of late would qualify as “damaged”, but the one who is not falls squarely into a category that can only be called “inaccessible”.
Which makes me wonder: Do I choose that? Do I have something against being in a healthy, supportive relationship? Have I chosen to isolate myself? Which of the two of us is really the inaccessible one?
Actually, I’ve been taking a break from most forms of writing. I’m not sure why. There haven’t been many things on my mind that have seemed worthy of throwing out there for the sake of whatever flavor of posterity comes as a side dish when the entrée is Blog.
I have felt mostly like retreating from the world, of late. I am not unhappy…far from it…but I simply have not felt like I have the energy to extend myself and deal with other people.
Part of it stems, I’m sure, from the realization that I’m still carrying around quite a lot of anger, which manifests itself primarily as self-abuse in the form of bad eating habits. I have also been quite a bit shorter with people than I like – also rooted in anger.
So, fat and unpleasant to be around, I’ve taken to being a bit reclusive: I’ve ignored voice mail from friends, failed to call when I said I would, blown off e-mails, brought my noise-canceling headphones to work, retreated to the virtual world of Microsoft Flight Simulator (where lately, I have been flying a model of a World War II-era fighter plane – with its virtual guns disabled…paging Dr. Freud, Dr. Howard, Dr. Fine, Dr. Howard!), and have started to learn to swear in Mandarin. (青蛙操的流氓) You probably don’t want to know what that means – and part of the joy of swearing in a language no one understands is…that no one understands.
The funny part of all this (and that’s not to say that learning to swear in a foreign language just for the sake being able to do so isn’t funny), is that I’m actually not depressed. I’m quite content with my life, which is, on the whole, pretty effing good. I am healthy (more or less – aside from my weight), I make a good living doing a job I love, and despite being solitary (a term I prefer to “single”), I’m not unmanageably lonely.
You know that feeling you get when you’re in the midst of something, feeling in the groove, and you’re surprised to find that you’re bleeding, but you have no idea when it happened or how? It isn’t particularly painful, or you’d have noticed the injury right away, but you need to stop and tend to it…and then you don’t quite feel safe any more, doing what you were doing.
That’s how I feel right now.
What’s bleeding? Certainly not my heart, which you’ll know from reading my last post. I’m not sure.
I do know that I’ve become aware of the perception people seem to have that I am damaged. And not just me…but the women I seem to be attracting. Not all of the women who’ve found me attractive of late would qualify as “damaged”, but the one who is not falls squarely into a category that can only be called “inaccessible”.
Which makes me wonder: Do I choose that? Do I have something against being in a healthy, supportive relationship? Have I chosen to isolate myself? Which of the two of us is really the inaccessible one?
Monday, March 06, 2006
IA
None of the military folks I know are happy.
Normally, these are people who greet life with ebullience neatly camouflaged behind a façade of darkly twisted humor.
I’ll give you an example. One morning at sea some years ago, I stood with two of my shipmates on the fo’c’sle (all the way up on the bow) of our ship, USS COWPENS (CG 63), as one of them prepared to lob two concussion grenades over the side as sound effects for our battle-readiness training. I had another role to fulfill that morning, but wouldn’t be needed until later, so I hoped to have an opportunity to toss one of the grenades. No particular reason, I just wanted to be able to say I’d once thrown a grenade. As leading chief of the division we three were in, I could occasionally do things like that.
Our conversation may have been jovial, but none of us was anything less than serious about the task at hand. A single mistake could kill all three of us. Basically, it was a regular day in the U.S. Navy.
The sound of a rapidly clanging bell cut our conversation short, followed by an announcement on the 1MC*: Fire, fire, fire! Class Charlie fire in After Steering. Away the Flying Squad, Away!
We exchanged glances.
There was a moment of reflective silence, as we all shifted a little nervously from foot to foot. A fire aboard ship can always lead to a long dip in the Deep Blue.
“Well,” I said, “if there’s got to be a fire in After Steering, I can’t think of any place I’d rather be than up here on the fo’c’sle.”
“You’re glad to be here!” said my buddy Matt. He pointed a thumb at Dan, and chuckled, “He’s the one holding the grenades!”
In short, sailors are fun-loving and fatalistic about the dangers they’ve chosen to face.
There’s a key word in that last sentence: chosen.
Two weeks ago, our command got a message announcing its obligation to support a program called “Individual Augmentation”, which is an attempt to help the Army and Marine Corps meet their personnel rotation requirements in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo, the Horn of Africa, and Guantanimo Bay by sending sailors to work in supporting roles such as communications specialists and prison guards. Each “Individual Augmentee” serves in his or her role for a minimum of one year.
There was a list of names accompanying the message. One of my office mates has been slated to go, and as of this morning, the rest have been put on notice that they, too, may be expected to go at any time. At the school next door, seven people are going.
Before they are assigned to a new and exciting location, they’ll undergo three days of medical screening and be offered time to take care of any legal matters (such as the writing of a will), followed by seven days of physical fitness, weapons, and tactics training. They’ll spend an hour or two learning about “Improvised Explosive Devices” (IEDs…booby traps), another hour or two on land navigation, a couple hours on convoy operations, and a couple on urban combat operations. The last of the seven days will be a practical exercise offering them an opportunity to put the things they’ve learned in the classroom to good use.
This is a Bad Idea.
First, these are people who bring a skill set that is entirely alien to the ground-pounder’s battlefield, and virtually none of what they know now will stand them in good stead when they climb aboard that first convoy.
Second, this lack of knowledge will make them a danger to themselves and to the units they are sent to augment.
Third, the danger that these individual augmentees bring with them will undermine the esprit de corps that is essential for a unit’s ability to perform its combat function.
Finally, no one volunteered for this shit.
In the short term, more American military members will die, and the war will last longer. In the longer term, our all-volunteer military will collapse from the inevitable wholesale departure of smart, well-trained professionals who won’t put up with such an egregious misapplication of their talents.
By now, you may be questioning the intelligence and sanity of our current leadership. Even if you hadn’t been already.
Actually, gentle reader, this is the cost of, “Oppose the war, support the troops.”
I turned it around on you, didn’t I?
The simple truth is that those who did choose to serve in the military are now being asked to accept the unthinkable because the average citizen couldn’t be bothered to pitch in. If you look back at past generations…your parents and grandparents…you’ll see that they rallied to their cause in ways our generation has dismissed as quaint, ignorant, and misguided. The members of Easy Company, 506th Battalion, 101st Airborne Division didn’t start asking about going home until the Germans capitulated. The men who commissioned the first USS COWPENS (CVL 25) deployed to the Pacific Theater in 1943 and didn’t come home for twenty-three months. No one told them they’d be able to go home in six months, or eight, or ten, or a year; they were shown a job, and they simply did it the best they could until they led the procession of American warships into Tokyo Bay in August 1945. They were prepared to go longer, if necessary, and nothing short of Unconditional Surrender could have convinced them that their task was done.
For the average citizen in this country today, guts are quaint and tenacity is misguided. Relationships are not the only things we can’t commit to.
There is a principle of strategy that was taught by the great samurai Miyamoto Musashi that went like this: Do not commit to combat until it is certain that you must. When you do, turn neither to the left nor to the right; drive directly toward the center of your enemy, and do not stop until one of you is defeated.
Perhaps it was never truly certain that we should commit to war in Iraq. But once committed, we should…as a nation of citizens…have pressed forward until we achieved unconditional surrender, instead of settling for what we have -- the hellishly slow descent through stalemate into self-induced defeat. Anyone who thinks we’d simply have installed a puppet government and left it to its own efforts to rebuild needs to visit Japan or Germany…both of which are leaders on the world stage, and neither feels any particular obligation to support the US at the expense of its own interests.
Opposed to the war? Fine. Noted. Like it nor not, we are there now, and if we were to leave now, we’d cause more harm than if we stayed to get the job done. So we might as well roll up our sleeves and get it done.
Support the troops? I have a suggestion for you, then: Become one.
* PA system aboard ship
Normally, these are people who greet life with ebullience neatly camouflaged behind a façade of darkly twisted humor.
I’ll give you an example. One morning at sea some years ago, I stood with two of my shipmates on the fo’c’sle (all the way up on the bow) of our ship, USS COWPENS (CG 63), as one of them prepared to lob two concussion grenades over the side as sound effects for our battle-readiness training. I had another role to fulfill that morning, but wouldn’t be needed until later, so I hoped to have an opportunity to toss one of the grenades. No particular reason, I just wanted to be able to say I’d once thrown a grenade. As leading chief of the division we three were in, I could occasionally do things like that.
Our conversation may have been jovial, but none of us was anything less than serious about the task at hand. A single mistake could kill all three of us. Basically, it was a regular day in the U.S. Navy.
The sound of a rapidly clanging bell cut our conversation short, followed by an announcement on the 1MC*: Fire, fire, fire! Class Charlie fire in After Steering. Away the Flying Squad, Away!
We exchanged glances.
There was a moment of reflective silence, as we all shifted a little nervously from foot to foot. A fire aboard ship can always lead to a long dip in the Deep Blue.
“Well,” I said, “if there’s got to be a fire in After Steering, I can’t think of any place I’d rather be than up here on the fo’c’sle.”
“You’re glad to be here!” said my buddy Matt. He pointed a thumb at Dan, and chuckled, “He’s the one holding the grenades!”
In short, sailors are fun-loving and fatalistic about the dangers they’ve chosen to face.
There’s a key word in that last sentence: chosen.
Two weeks ago, our command got a message announcing its obligation to support a program called “Individual Augmentation”, which is an attempt to help the Army and Marine Corps meet their personnel rotation requirements in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo, the Horn of Africa, and Guantanimo Bay by sending sailors to work in supporting roles such as communications specialists and prison guards. Each “Individual Augmentee” serves in his or her role for a minimum of one year.
There was a list of names accompanying the message. One of my office mates has been slated to go, and as of this morning, the rest have been put on notice that they, too, may be expected to go at any time. At the school next door, seven people are going.
Before they are assigned to a new and exciting location, they’ll undergo three days of medical screening and be offered time to take care of any legal matters (such as the writing of a will), followed by seven days of physical fitness, weapons, and tactics training. They’ll spend an hour or two learning about “Improvised Explosive Devices” (IEDs…booby traps), another hour or two on land navigation, a couple hours on convoy operations, and a couple on urban combat operations. The last of the seven days will be a practical exercise offering them an opportunity to put the things they’ve learned in the classroom to good use.
This is a Bad Idea.
First, these are people who bring a skill set that is entirely alien to the ground-pounder’s battlefield, and virtually none of what they know now will stand them in good stead when they climb aboard that first convoy.
Second, this lack of knowledge will make them a danger to themselves and to the units they are sent to augment.
Third, the danger that these individual augmentees bring with them will undermine the esprit de corps that is essential for a unit’s ability to perform its combat function.
Finally, no one volunteered for this shit.
In the short term, more American military members will die, and the war will last longer. In the longer term, our all-volunteer military will collapse from the inevitable wholesale departure of smart, well-trained professionals who won’t put up with such an egregious misapplication of their talents.
By now, you may be questioning the intelligence and sanity of our current leadership. Even if you hadn’t been already.
Actually, gentle reader, this is the cost of, “Oppose the war, support the troops.”
I turned it around on you, didn’t I?
The simple truth is that those who did choose to serve in the military are now being asked to accept the unthinkable because the average citizen couldn’t be bothered to pitch in. If you look back at past generations…your parents and grandparents…you’ll see that they rallied to their cause in ways our generation has dismissed as quaint, ignorant, and misguided. The members of Easy Company, 506th Battalion, 101st Airborne Division didn’t start asking about going home until the Germans capitulated. The men who commissioned the first USS COWPENS (CVL 25) deployed to the Pacific Theater in 1943 and didn’t come home for twenty-three months. No one told them they’d be able to go home in six months, or eight, or ten, or a year; they were shown a job, and they simply did it the best they could until they led the procession of American warships into Tokyo Bay in August 1945. They were prepared to go longer, if necessary, and nothing short of Unconditional Surrender could have convinced them that their task was done.
For the average citizen in this country today, guts are quaint and tenacity is misguided. Relationships are not the only things we can’t commit to.
There is a principle of strategy that was taught by the great samurai Miyamoto Musashi that went like this: Do not commit to combat until it is certain that you must. When you do, turn neither to the left nor to the right; drive directly toward the center of your enemy, and do not stop until one of you is defeated.
Perhaps it was never truly certain that we should commit to war in Iraq. But once committed, we should…as a nation of citizens…have pressed forward until we achieved unconditional surrender, instead of settling for what we have -- the hellishly slow descent through stalemate into self-induced defeat. Anyone who thinks we’d simply have installed a puppet government and left it to its own efforts to rebuild needs to visit Japan or Germany…both of which are leaders on the world stage, and neither feels any particular obligation to support the US at the expense of its own interests.
Opposed to the war? Fine. Noted. Like it nor not, we are there now, and if we were to leave now, we’d cause more harm than if we stayed to get the job done. So we might as well roll up our sleeves and get it done.
Support the troops? I have a suggestion for you, then: Become one.
* PA system aboard ship
Friday, February 24, 2006
My Work Here Isn't Done
Have you ever watched a film, or read a book that truly moved you? One that made your heart swell in your chest, but didn’t stop there…it made your life swell? I just watched such a film: Meet Joe Black
Granted, this film is now eight years old, so I should have seen it by now, but I hadn’t, until today.
It’s a daunting film, running just shy of three hours, with very little action…this is a film about the last days of a man’s life, a man who knows that Death could take him at any moment, and yet it lingers over tiny, exquisite details.
I had a busy week, this week, traveling for business and meeting with compatriots who mostly think of me as an oddity, a genius-cum-crackpot, a heretic. As is the community’s habit, they dismissed months of my work out of hand, without a whole lot of discussion. We’re not comfortable with this, they say, when they say anything at all. It is disconcerting to propose an elegantly simple solution to a complex problem and be met with neither disdain nor acceptance, but merely…silence.
My boss reminded me that this community is famous for doing just that, and that a good many of the current practices were once met with disapprobation. Heresy is important to progress.
After seeing a film like Meet Joe Black, I find myself taking stock of my life, wondering if I’ve done all I can, if there’s anything more I can or should be doing. Is it enough that I helped coordinate a wish for a Make-a-Wish child? It was just the once, after all. Is it enough to have served as a rape crisis advocate? Is it enough that people often rely on me when they feel they have no place else to turn?
There are times when I withdraw. I say I’ll call, and then I don’t. I forget a meeting or fail to come through with the help I offered. Is it enough to simply apologize, to admit that I’m not perfect? Isn’t there more? I always feel I can do more.
People have helped me so often, have sacrificed in large and small ways to bring me to this point that I feel that I should earn the things they’ve done for me, and I will always wonder if I’ve done enough. It is a powerful drive that comes almost entirely from the uncertainty in my center.
Perhaps that is what makes me a good man.
Granted, this film is now eight years old, so I should have seen it by now, but I hadn’t, until today.
It’s a daunting film, running just shy of three hours, with very little action…this is a film about the last days of a man’s life, a man who knows that Death could take him at any moment, and yet it lingers over tiny, exquisite details.
I had a busy week, this week, traveling for business and meeting with compatriots who mostly think of me as an oddity, a genius-cum-crackpot, a heretic. As is the community’s habit, they dismissed months of my work out of hand, without a whole lot of discussion. We’re not comfortable with this, they say, when they say anything at all. It is disconcerting to propose an elegantly simple solution to a complex problem and be met with neither disdain nor acceptance, but merely…silence.
My boss reminded me that this community is famous for doing just that, and that a good many of the current practices were once met with disapprobation. Heresy is important to progress.
After seeing a film like Meet Joe Black, I find myself taking stock of my life, wondering if I’ve done all I can, if there’s anything more I can or should be doing. Is it enough that I helped coordinate a wish for a Make-a-Wish child? It was just the once, after all. Is it enough to have served as a rape crisis advocate? Is it enough that people often rely on me when they feel they have no place else to turn?
There are times when I withdraw. I say I’ll call, and then I don’t. I forget a meeting or fail to come through with the help I offered. Is it enough to simply apologize, to admit that I’m not perfect? Isn’t there more? I always feel I can do more.
People have helped me so often, have sacrificed in large and small ways to bring me to this point that I feel that I should earn the things they’ve done for me, and I will always wonder if I’ve done enough. It is a powerful drive that comes almost entirely from the uncertainty in my center.
Perhaps that is what makes me a good man.
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Good Things

Have you ever met anyone who, without trying, or even meaning to, changes your life? Not just your life, but the way you view your life?
It’s hard to quantify, the effect we have on other people’s lives. It can be even harder to say, “Your presence in my life makes a difference.”
A couple weeks ago, someone suggested to me that we boycott Valentine’s Day, we solitary people. I responded by proposing the opposite – that she be my Valentine. I sent her flowers today…virtual flowers, actually, because I’m a dork.
See, I don’t think that Valentine’s Day ought to be just for lovers, or people who want to be lovers, or even people who simply want to encase their lovers in chocolate. I think it’s about communicating to those around us that we appreciate the changes they bring about in us.
To all of you who read this blog, a late-evening Happy Valentine’s Day. And thank you. You’ve helped me to trust in my skills as a writer, and that makes a difference.
And what happy changes have been brought about by my Virtual Valentine? That’s a question I’ll answer only for her.
All good things.
TSC
I’d like to apologize for not writing more. I haven’t forgotten you all! Far from it: I’ve been incredibly busy over the last couple weeks.
In the meantime, you may recall that I asked for your prayers for my unborn niece, who was diagnosed last month with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.
I’d like to direct your attention to this web site regarding Tuberous Sclerosis, and ask again for your prayers.
My sister and her husband are meeting with another specialist on Thursday, to discuss the results of last week’s MRI.
In the meantime, you may recall that I asked for your prayers for my unborn niece, who was diagnosed last month with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.
I’d like to direct your attention to this web site regarding Tuberous Sclerosis, and ask again for your prayers.
My sister and her husband are meeting with another specialist on Thursday, to discuss the results of last week’s MRI.
Thursday, February 02, 2006
Because Prayer Helps
…and because Meg asked:
If you pray, pray for Ruth, Rowland, Emily, Marie, Jamie, and Loni -- for comfort, healing, and peace. It's important. And pass it onto your friends. Thanks, guys.
If you pray, pray for Ruth, Rowland, Emily, Marie, Jamie, and Loni -- for comfort, healing, and peace. It's important. And pass it onto your friends. Thanks, guys.
Tilapia Is The New Cod
In honor of completing my Five Weird Things post, I took my daughter to Red Lobster…thought it would be a fitting tribute, since Sherri loves the place so much. For that very reason, I will not mention the vague contempt which I, a New Englander, have always held for seafood restaurant chains. I will say that I remember very clearly how nice it was that I used to be able to get live lobsters for a buck seventy-five a pound, or a buck and a half if I happened to catch a lobsterman in the parking lot at the seafood stand.
The service we received tonight was noteworthy, as I shall attempt to relate:
“Good evening, sir, my name is Gabe, and I’ll be taking care of you this evening. Can I offer you something to drink?”
Heidi orders a Coke, and I order iced tea – no lemon.
“Excellent. Would you care for an appetizer this evening?”
“No, thank you.”
“Alright. Would you like to hear the specials?”
“No, thank you. I think we’re ready to order.”
“Great,” says Gabe, turning his attention to Heidi. “What can I get for you?”
“I’ll have the shrimp Caesar salad.”
“Excellent. And for your choice of vegetables? We have mashed potatoes, rice pilaf, steamed vegetables, or cole slaw.”
Heidi and I exchange quizzical looks.
There is a moment of bemused silence, with Gabe’s pen hovering patiently over his order pad. I recover first, and ask the obvious question, “There’s a choice of vegetables with a salad?”
Gabe smiles benevolently at us, his apparently uber-bumpkin patrons. “A salad comes with the shrimp, yes.”
Still bewildered, I frown slightly and ask again, “But she ordered the shrimp Caesar salad. Doesn’t that pretty much already have vegetables?”
“Oh!” exclaims Gabe. “Of course.”
Gabe scribbles a dozen horizontal lines on his pad, then writes furiously. While I cannot see what he is writing, I imagine it to be, confused chick gets SHRIMP CAESAR.
He then turns to me. “And you, sir?”
“I’ll have the Sam Adams battered fish and chips.”
“Excellent. That comes with chips, which are actually French Fries. You can order another side of your choice, if you like. We have mashed potatoes, rice pilaf…”
“Another side? Sounds great. I’d like the cole slaw, please.”
Gabe fixes me momentarily with a glance that, in retrospect, should have seemed significant, but at the time could have meant…confusion? Disbelief? That he’ll be blogging this later?
“Great,” he says, “I’ll be right back with your drinks and cole slaw.”
And he is off before I can ask, What did you say? Did you just say that you’d be right back with our drinks and cole slaw?
I ask Heidi instead. She agrees, that’s what he said.
Couldn’t be, I postulated. It’s noisy here, and we must have misunderstood.
When he brought our drinks (and my dinner salad), he hesitated for a moment before asking, “Would you like me to bring your cole slaw now, or with your fish, sir?” He fixes me with a look of concerned confusion, as though I had ordered a steak with chocolate sauce.
I see his confusion and raise him a puzzlement and a confloption. (He doesn’t realize it at this point, but I can see that he’ll be flummoxed at the turn.) “With my dinner will be fine,” I say. I am in no mood to have cole slaw with my salad.
When dinner arrives, he sets down Heidi’s Caesar salad, and then turns his attention to me. He places the side dish of cole slaw at my left, and sets the basket of fish in front of me.
It is a large-ish basket of fish.
There are no chips.
It is a basket containing only fish.
“Is there anything else I can get for you?” Gabe asks. From the look on his face, it is clear that Gabe wishes to escape us and what clearly seem to him to be bizarre requests.
“Yes,” I say. “Where are my chips? I thought fish and chips would come with actual, you know, chips. French Fries. Pommes frites.” (Okay, I made the “pommes frites” part up.)
Gabe casts his eyes about in a manner reminiscent of a garden-raiding rabbit caught snacking by a Rottweiler for whom the moment carries no real urgency. “You ordered cole slaw instead of chips, sir.”
“I did?”
“Yes, sir.” He wheels over a chalk board and proceeds to draw a flow chart of our initial conversation, in which it seems I did, in fact, order fish and chips, hold the chips, add a side of slaw.
The service we received tonight was noteworthy, as I shall attempt to relate:
“Good evening, sir, my name is Gabe, and I’ll be taking care of you this evening. Can I offer you something to drink?”
Heidi orders a Coke, and I order iced tea – no lemon.
“Excellent. Would you care for an appetizer this evening?”
“No, thank you.”
“Alright. Would you like to hear the specials?”
“No, thank you. I think we’re ready to order.”
“Great,” says Gabe, turning his attention to Heidi. “What can I get for you?”
“I’ll have the shrimp Caesar salad.”
“Excellent. And for your choice of vegetables? We have mashed potatoes, rice pilaf, steamed vegetables, or cole slaw.”
Heidi and I exchange quizzical looks.
There is a moment of bemused silence, with Gabe’s pen hovering patiently over his order pad. I recover first, and ask the obvious question, “There’s a choice of vegetables with a salad?”
Gabe smiles benevolently at us, his apparently uber-bumpkin patrons. “A salad comes with the shrimp, yes.”
Still bewildered, I frown slightly and ask again, “But she ordered the shrimp Caesar salad. Doesn’t that pretty much already have vegetables?”
“Oh!” exclaims Gabe. “Of course.”
Gabe scribbles a dozen horizontal lines on his pad, then writes furiously. While I cannot see what he is writing, I imagine it to be, confused chick gets SHRIMP CAESAR.
He then turns to me. “And you, sir?”
“I’ll have the Sam Adams battered fish and chips.”
“Excellent. That comes with chips, which are actually French Fries. You can order another side of your choice, if you like. We have mashed potatoes, rice pilaf…”
“Another side? Sounds great. I’d like the cole slaw, please.”
Gabe fixes me momentarily with a glance that, in retrospect, should have seemed significant, but at the time could have meant…confusion? Disbelief? That he’ll be blogging this later?
“Great,” he says, “I’ll be right back with your drinks and cole slaw.”
And he is off before I can ask, What did you say? Did you just say that you’d be right back with our drinks and cole slaw?
I ask Heidi instead. She agrees, that’s what he said.
Couldn’t be, I postulated. It’s noisy here, and we must have misunderstood.
When he brought our drinks (and my dinner salad), he hesitated for a moment before asking, “Would you like me to bring your cole slaw now, or with your fish, sir?” He fixes me with a look of concerned confusion, as though I had ordered a steak with chocolate sauce.
I see his confusion and raise him a puzzlement and a confloption. (He doesn’t realize it at this point, but I can see that he’ll be flummoxed at the turn.) “With my dinner will be fine,” I say. I am in no mood to have cole slaw with my salad.
When dinner arrives, he sets down Heidi’s Caesar salad, and then turns his attention to me. He places the side dish of cole slaw at my left, and sets the basket of fish in front of me.
It is a large-ish basket of fish.
There are no chips.
It is a basket containing only fish.
“Is there anything else I can get for you?” Gabe asks. From the look on his face, it is clear that Gabe wishes to escape us and what clearly seem to him to be bizarre requests.
“Yes,” I say. “Where are my chips? I thought fish and chips would come with actual, you know, chips. French Fries. Pommes frites.” (Okay, I made the “pommes frites” part up.)
Gabe casts his eyes about in a manner reminiscent of a garden-raiding rabbit caught snacking by a Rottweiler for whom the moment carries no real urgency. “You ordered cole slaw instead of chips, sir.”
“I did?”
“Yes, sir.” He wheels over a chalk board and proceeds to draw a flow chart of our initial conversation, in which it seems I did, in fact, order fish and chips, hold the chips, add a side of slaw.
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
At Last, Five Weird Things
Five weird habits. Sherri wants five weird habits. Of mine. Actually, it’s five more weird habits, because, evidently, in Sherri’s mind, the ten weird habits I already wrote about aren’t enough. (But I think she owed me a tag, anyway, so she’s forgiven.) (Not that she needed to be. I’m just saying, is all.)
So here goes.
1. I obsess about things…just not for very long.
Dennis Miller refers to this as ADDOCD: I keep changing the things I obsess about. Work projects will do it for me. I’ll get focused on a problem at work, then bring it home with me (in my mind, not on paper), and lay awake that night working on a solution. The next morning, with or without a solution, I will find something else to be concerned about. I have been known to go from losing sleep about a satellite communications issue to ranting for half a day about finding the coffee pot empty even though I was the third coffee drinker to arrive that morning. The vast amount of energy I poured into online dating some months ago is now almost entirely devoted to flight simulation. If I lose focus on one thing, I have to compensate by giving far too much of my attention somewhere else, as though my freaky little world is defined by some Newtonian Law of Conservation of Obsessions.
2. I am insanely defensive about my computer.
This one has two parts, one for work and one for home. At work, I have a system of placing files that makes sense to me and I don’t give a Yugo mechanic’s expletive whether anyone else can find one of my PowerPoint presentations or not. If someone adds an icon to my desktop or changes the content of a database, my customary reaction is to unleash a passionate string of colorful and highly original invective. At home, keep your grubby dick skinners off my machine. I built it from parts, and it is unique. No, you do not know how to fix the problem, so shut up and go back to watching TV. That whole thing in Chaos Theory about a butterfly flapping its wings in the Amazon and the weather changing somewhere else? Absolutely true. Hurricane Katrina began shortly after I vented my…er…opinion…to the atmosphere because a friend “just checking e-mail” tried to replace my unresponsive wireless mouse with a standard PS2 mouse instead of telling me so that I could change the wireless mouse’s batteries. Seriously, the IAEA could rid themselves of a huge problem if they quietly suggested to Iran that it should surprise me by up-clocking my motherboard.
3. I am often stunningly creative in my expletives.
Granted, sometimes I resort to whatever fricative comes immediately to mind, but there are moments of sublime inspiration when I should really stop in mid-rant and write some of this shit down. Anything less than fifteen syllables and I’m just doing it for laughs. I am not at all unlike the Old Man in A Christmas Story, who, as we know, worked in profanity the way other artists might work in oils or clay. And thanks to Erica, I have a colorful new addition to my arsenal – er – repertoire: corn-speckled dog turd. Which leads me to the fact that…
4. I collect colorful phrases.
I discovered a long time ago that if you’ve got an unexpectedly descriptive phrase at the ready (and these are not necessarily profane), people might actually remember a point you’re trying to make. For example, gathering a large number of minute details for a particular project might be referred to as sweeping the marbles. Any project that is doomed to collapse under the weight of its own ineptitude is a self-licking ice cream cone. That idiot over there doesn’t need to pull his head out of his ass, he needs a rectal craniotomy. If I’ve just said something terminally embarrassing in a crowded and noisy room, it is inevitable that I time it so that the room will be as quiet as a mouse pissing on a Q-tip.
I actually write some of these down.
5. I flush the toilet while I’m still peeing.
Yes. I know. I have no idea why I do this, but I catch myself at it at least once a day, and the mental conversation goes something like this:
No-no! No! Awwww!
Why did I just do that?
I don’t know. To mask the sound of my urinating?
But no one is home.
To save time?
Yes. That’s it. I’m saving time by flushing twice.
Thank you. It’s nice to know my efforts are understood.
So here goes.
1. I obsess about things…just not for very long.
Dennis Miller refers to this as ADDOCD: I keep changing the things I obsess about. Work projects will do it for me. I’ll get focused on a problem at work, then bring it home with me (in my mind, not on paper), and lay awake that night working on a solution. The next morning, with or without a solution, I will find something else to be concerned about. I have been known to go from losing sleep about a satellite communications issue to ranting for half a day about finding the coffee pot empty even though I was the third coffee drinker to arrive that morning. The vast amount of energy I poured into online dating some months ago is now almost entirely devoted to flight simulation. If I lose focus on one thing, I have to compensate by giving far too much of my attention somewhere else, as though my freaky little world is defined by some Newtonian Law of Conservation of Obsessions.
2. I am insanely defensive about my computer.
This one has two parts, one for work and one for home. At work, I have a system of placing files that makes sense to me and I don’t give a Yugo mechanic’s expletive whether anyone else can find one of my PowerPoint presentations or not. If someone adds an icon to my desktop or changes the content of a database, my customary reaction is to unleash a passionate string of colorful and highly original invective. At home, keep your grubby dick skinners off my machine. I built it from parts, and it is unique. No, you do not know how to fix the problem, so shut up and go back to watching TV. That whole thing in Chaos Theory about a butterfly flapping its wings in the Amazon and the weather changing somewhere else? Absolutely true. Hurricane Katrina began shortly after I vented my…er…opinion…to the atmosphere because a friend “just checking e-mail” tried to replace my unresponsive wireless mouse with a standard PS2 mouse instead of telling me so that I could change the wireless mouse’s batteries. Seriously, the IAEA could rid themselves of a huge problem if they quietly suggested to Iran that it should surprise me by up-clocking my motherboard.
3. I am often stunningly creative in my expletives.
Granted, sometimes I resort to whatever fricative comes immediately to mind, but there are moments of sublime inspiration when I should really stop in mid-rant and write some of this shit down. Anything less than fifteen syllables and I’m just doing it for laughs. I am not at all unlike the Old Man in A Christmas Story, who, as we know, worked in profanity the way other artists might work in oils or clay. And thanks to Erica, I have a colorful new addition to my arsenal – er – repertoire: corn-speckled dog turd. Which leads me to the fact that…
4. I collect colorful phrases.
I discovered a long time ago that if you’ve got an unexpectedly descriptive phrase at the ready (and these are not necessarily profane), people might actually remember a point you’re trying to make. For example, gathering a large number of minute details for a particular project might be referred to as sweeping the marbles. Any project that is doomed to collapse under the weight of its own ineptitude is a self-licking ice cream cone. That idiot over there doesn’t need to pull his head out of his ass, he needs a rectal craniotomy. If I’ve just said something terminally embarrassing in a crowded and noisy room, it is inevitable that I time it so that the room will be as quiet as a mouse pissing on a Q-tip.
I actually write some of these down.
5. I flush the toilet while I’m still peeing.
Yes. I know. I have no idea why I do this, but I catch myself at it at least once a day, and the mental conversation goes something like this:
No-no! No! Awwww!
Why did I just do that?
I don’t know. To mask the sound of my urinating?
But no one is home.
To save time?
Yes. That’s it. I’m saving time by flushing twice.
Thank you. It’s nice to know my efforts are understood.
Friday, January 27, 2006
Powerlessness By Proxy
The amazing and beautiful Lisa reminded me that it’s been a few days since I wrote anything, and her post this evening brought some thoughts to the forefront that I’d like to share with you.
A few Sundays ago, my daughter and I joined my best friend, Bear, in celebrating his sobriety. Bear, you see, is an alcoholic.
He and I have known each other for almost twenty-five years, since we stood a very cold midwatch together as pier sentries on Pier 12 at the Naval Operating Base in Norfolk, Virginia. We made each other laugh, and to tell you the truth, I’ve always considered him to be the funny one.
And because he and I have been friends for so long, he wouldn’t hesitate at all to agree with me on that point.
If you’ve never been to an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, and you’re invited to attend one, don’t turn it down. Don’t worry if you’re not an alcoholic, they’ll love you anyway, because that’s what they do.
All through our pre-deployment work-ups in 1981, Bear and I hung out together. We’d keep each other laughing at General Quarters, because our stations were right next to each other. We’d make each other laugh when he was doing that whole backwards writing thing that you can only see in old movies, now. (He once wrote my sister a letter that way, which she thought was the coolest thing.) And because we were always laughing, we were always getting in trouble for laughing at inappropriate times. Think Monty Python meets “We’re No Angels”…I was the De Niro to his Penn, the Cleese to his Idle.
Being young sailors, it was inevitable that we would drink. I’d never had so much booze. He had more experience overseas than I did, and he suggested (wisely, as it turned out), that we take turns being reasonably sober, so that one of us would always be able to get us both back to the ship.
We had us some adventures, we did.
Now, most guys who’ve been friends as long as we have would probably look back on their drunken youth with a degree of fondness that simply isn’t there when he and I reminisce about those days.
Not us. When we talk about it, it’s at an AA meeting, because what it represents for us is the beginning of ten years worth of fuzzy memories for him, ten years of things he’s worked to make amends for throughout the last fifteen years. He’s lived through a motorcycle accident and a car accident and a thousand more agonies neither you nor I will ever fully understand, and I made it easy for him to start down that path.
To me, the divergence in the roads we took from that inebriated season is the most incomprehensible difference between us. When he stands up at a meeting and talks about taking turns getting shit-faced, it feels like an indictment. In that hall, I will forever be “the sober one”, the one who had control and for a time, didn’t help his best friend.
In spite of my failing, and because of it, the men and women in that meeting nod respectfully as Bear introduces me, and they accept me. They understand what it is to let a friend down, and my fear that they will judge me for what I didn’t do is unfounded.
They understand the truth: that nothing and no one could have kept him from walking that foggy road. Alcoholics understand powerlessness.
When I talk with the man Bear is today, I am astounded at the changes in him. It isn’t simply the absence of alcohol in his life, it’s the depth of character that has grown out of his quest for Sobriety. He is worthy of it.
In writing that last paragraph, it dawned on me why there is no judgment for me when Bear speaks of trading nights of drunkenness: If we are all powerless ourselves, how can we control the actions of others?
A few Sundays ago, my daughter and I joined my best friend, Bear, in celebrating his sobriety. Bear, you see, is an alcoholic.
He and I have known each other for almost twenty-five years, since we stood a very cold midwatch together as pier sentries on Pier 12 at the Naval Operating Base in Norfolk, Virginia. We made each other laugh, and to tell you the truth, I’ve always considered him to be the funny one.
And because he and I have been friends for so long, he wouldn’t hesitate at all to agree with me on that point.
If you’ve never been to an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, and you’re invited to attend one, don’t turn it down. Don’t worry if you’re not an alcoholic, they’ll love you anyway, because that’s what they do.
All through our pre-deployment work-ups in 1981, Bear and I hung out together. We’d keep each other laughing at General Quarters, because our stations were right next to each other. We’d make each other laugh when he was doing that whole backwards writing thing that you can only see in old movies, now. (He once wrote my sister a letter that way, which she thought was the coolest thing.) And because we were always laughing, we were always getting in trouble for laughing at inappropriate times. Think Monty Python meets “We’re No Angels”…I was the De Niro to his Penn, the Cleese to his Idle.
Being young sailors, it was inevitable that we would drink. I’d never had so much booze. He had more experience overseas than I did, and he suggested (wisely, as it turned out), that we take turns being reasonably sober, so that one of us would always be able to get us both back to the ship.
We had us some adventures, we did.
Now, most guys who’ve been friends as long as we have would probably look back on their drunken youth with a degree of fondness that simply isn’t there when he and I reminisce about those days.
Not us. When we talk about it, it’s at an AA meeting, because what it represents for us is the beginning of ten years worth of fuzzy memories for him, ten years of things he’s worked to make amends for throughout the last fifteen years. He’s lived through a motorcycle accident and a car accident and a thousand more agonies neither you nor I will ever fully understand, and I made it easy for him to start down that path.
To me, the divergence in the roads we took from that inebriated season is the most incomprehensible difference between us. When he stands up at a meeting and talks about taking turns getting shit-faced, it feels like an indictment. In that hall, I will forever be “the sober one”, the one who had control and for a time, didn’t help his best friend.
In spite of my failing, and because of it, the men and women in that meeting nod respectfully as Bear introduces me, and they accept me. They understand what it is to let a friend down, and my fear that they will judge me for what I didn’t do is unfounded.
They understand the truth: that nothing and no one could have kept him from walking that foggy road. Alcoholics understand powerlessness.
When I talk with the man Bear is today, I am astounded at the changes in him. It isn’t simply the absence of alcohol in his life, it’s the depth of character that has grown out of his quest for Sobriety. He is worthy of it.
In writing that last paragraph, it dawned on me why there is no judgment for me when Bear speaks of trading nights of drunkenness: If we are all powerless ourselves, how can we control the actions of others?
Monday, January 23, 2006
The Kind of Balance We Seek
Saturday, January 21, 2006
The Tribe Has Spoken
It often happens that Sherri writes something that seems worthy of contributing to on a grander scale than what can be contained in a two-inch comment box. In this case, she wrote about the stupidity of certain television shows.
It probably comes as no surprise that I eschew television shows that are not intelligently written. True, I got hooked on the first season of “The Apprentice”, but that was before I learned that “reality” television shows are scripted, too. Yes, they are. Not in the conventional sense of actors being handed pages to read. “Reality” shows are scripted backwards, sort of the same way that China designs airplanes: by reverse engineering. The actors are put into situations that pose the potential for conflict, and then filmed from multiple angles simultaneously. The writing staff then takes the raw video footage and pieces it together in a way that makes a story that can be told in 46 minutes. The story must have incident, which is to say that there must be an event that can stand on its own without explanation. The purpose of incident is to offer an advertising hook, to get people to watch the show, and to keep people tuned in through the commercials. Incidents happen within a minute of each commercial break…and the Trademark Incident happens at the end of the show: “You’re fired.” “The tribe has spoken.”
The problem with this is that it’s an unnatural act trying to pass itself off as a natural act. There’s an old scientific principle which states that, “The observer cannot avoid changing that which is being observed.” The presence of (multiple) cameras removes all reality from the situations being filmed for the “reality” show. Or, as Adam Savage says on “Mythbusters”, “I reject your reality and substitute my own.”
So, basically, those shows are nothing more than badly-written fiction. They are the Robert James Waller novels of television. (And yes, I know, every woman on the planet swoons at the mere mention of The Bridges of Madison County. It’s still dreck.)
I need something smart, something that engages my mind on more than one level. Something that isn’t focused entirely on impossibly good-looking people. (I’ll buy the idea that you can have a PhD in Marine Biology by the time you’re 26, but you won’t also have had time to make yourself look that good in a wet suit. There has to be some evidence of all that cold pizza you habitually ate in the lab at two AM while you were working on your dissertation. Also, am I the only one who thinks that the question of how these new marine creatures make the water warm could be answered with a trip to the nearest public pool?)
I watch “The Gilmore Girls”, because the show is about smart people who seem to be okay with the fact that they don’t have it all figured out. The dialogue is full of cultural references both pop and not-so-pop, and often has more than one reference in a single line, as with this exchange between Lorelai and Rory discussing the new waiter at their favorite diner:
Rory: Ew!
Lorelai: He doesn’t look that bad.
Rory: He’s the boy who dissected a frog, didn’t wash his hands, and then ate a sandwich.
Lorelai: Ew!
Rory: He’s like the lost Farrelly brother. He’s so stupid. He watched “The Breakfast Club” and decided to tape his own butt cheeks together.
Granted, it’s not “The West Wing”, but then not much is. “The West Wing” makes me very glad I have TiVo. I don’t expect the show to last much longer, though – they had “A Very Special Wedding Episode” a few weeks ago, which means the bell is tolling. It was great run while it lasted.
“Lost” is, of course, one of the best shows on television, though I’m a little disturbed about what I’ll call character churn on the show. Character churn is when characters are written off the show and new characters replace them. This is happening too often, I think. And of course, it’s an island, so the only way to write characters off the show is to kill them. It’s pretty obvious that the 2021 season on ABC will not include a Lost Reunion, nor will we ever be subjected to A Very Lost Christmas. The other disturbing thing about the show is the morality of it: the first female character to get laid since the crash became the first female character to be killed, later in the same show. I can set that aside, though, because it’s still great theatre.
Smart, funny, original shows often disappear too quickly. “Sports Night” lasted a season and a half before it got kicked off the Fox island.
Thanks to my daughter, I’ve discovered another show that met a premature demise: “Firefly”. Part space opera, part western, this show was smart, funny, and corny all at once. The characters were stereotypes (a Hero, a hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold, a preacher, a doctor, a crazy girl on the run from the law…), but the dialogue was fast-paced, witty, and exotic. It had the two qualities that made the first three Star Wars movies (episodes IV through VI, for those of you born after 1975): witty banter and a refusal to take itself too seriously.
Actually, I’m glad that “Firefly” didn’t last longer than it did. Like “Buffy, The Vampire Slayer”, it might have lost its edgy wit after a few seasons, and left us with the dark shell of a once-great show.
So what will I be watching next week?
It probably comes as no surprise that I eschew television shows that are not intelligently written. True, I got hooked on the first season of “The Apprentice”, but that was before I learned that “reality” television shows are scripted, too. Yes, they are. Not in the conventional sense of actors being handed pages to read. “Reality” shows are scripted backwards, sort of the same way that China designs airplanes: by reverse engineering. The actors are put into situations that pose the potential for conflict, and then filmed from multiple angles simultaneously. The writing staff then takes the raw video footage and pieces it together in a way that makes a story that can be told in 46 minutes. The story must have incident, which is to say that there must be an event that can stand on its own without explanation. The purpose of incident is to offer an advertising hook, to get people to watch the show, and to keep people tuned in through the commercials. Incidents happen within a minute of each commercial break…and the Trademark Incident happens at the end of the show: “You’re fired.” “The tribe has spoken.”
The problem with this is that it’s an unnatural act trying to pass itself off as a natural act. There’s an old scientific principle which states that, “The observer cannot avoid changing that which is being observed.” The presence of (multiple) cameras removes all reality from the situations being filmed for the “reality” show. Or, as Adam Savage says on “Mythbusters”, “I reject your reality and substitute my own.”
So, basically, those shows are nothing more than badly-written fiction. They are the Robert James Waller novels of television. (And yes, I know, every woman on the planet swoons at the mere mention of The Bridges of Madison County. It’s still dreck.)
I need something smart, something that engages my mind on more than one level. Something that isn’t focused entirely on impossibly good-looking people. (I’ll buy the idea that you can have a PhD in Marine Biology by the time you’re 26, but you won’t also have had time to make yourself look that good in a wet suit. There has to be some evidence of all that cold pizza you habitually ate in the lab at two AM while you were working on your dissertation. Also, am I the only one who thinks that the question of how these new marine creatures make the water warm could be answered with a trip to the nearest public pool?)
I watch “The Gilmore Girls”, because the show is about smart people who seem to be okay with the fact that they don’t have it all figured out. The dialogue is full of cultural references both pop and not-so-pop, and often has more than one reference in a single line, as with this exchange between Lorelai and Rory discussing the new waiter at their favorite diner:
Rory: Ew!
Lorelai: He doesn’t look that bad.
Rory: He’s the boy who dissected a frog, didn’t wash his hands, and then ate a sandwich.
Lorelai: Ew!
Rory: He’s like the lost Farrelly brother. He’s so stupid. He watched “The Breakfast Club” and decided to tape his own butt cheeks together.
Granted, it’s not “The West Wing”, but then not much is. “The West Wing” makes me very glad I have TiVo. I don’t expect the show to last much longer, though – they had “A Very Special Wedding Episode” a few weeks ago, which means the bell is tolling. It was great run while it lasted.
“Lost” is, of course, one of the best shows on television, though I’m a little disturbed about what I’ll call character churn on the show. Character churn is when characters are written off the show and new characters replace them. This is happening too often, I think. And of course, it’s an island, so the only way to write characters off the show is to kill them. It’s pretty obvious that the 2021 season on ABC will not include a Lost Reunion, nor will we ever be subjected to A Very Lost Christmas. The other disturbing thing about the show is the morality of it: the first female character to get laid since the crash became the first female character to be killed, later in the same show. I can set that aside, though, because it’s still great theatre.
Smart, funny, original shows often disappear too quickly. “Sports Night” lasted a season and a half before it got kicked off the Fox island.
Thanks to my daughter, I’ve discovered another show that met a premature demise: “Firefly”. Part space opera, part western, this show was smart, funny, and corny all at once. The characters were stereotypes (a Hero, a hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold, a preacher, a doctor, a crazy girl on the run from the law…), but the dialogue was fast-paced, witty, and exotic. It had the two qualities that made the first three Star Wars movies (episodes IV through VI, for those of you born after 1975): witty banter and a refusal to take itself too seriously.
Actually, I’m glad that “Firefly” didn’t last longer than it did. Like “Buffy, The Vampire Slayer”, it might have lost its edgy wit after a few seasons, and left us with the dark shell of a once-great show.
So what will I be watching next week?
Thursday, January 19, 2006
Traveling Thoughts
There is a new quote hanging over my writing space today:
“What are we but our stories?” – James Patterson
Yes.
Okay, as I write this, it’s not hanging there yet, but it will be as soon as I can get home and fire up the printer. And find the tape. Because having a teenager in the house means that you can never find the tape. Or the scissors.
At the moment, I am sitting in the Houston International Airport terminal at six in the evening. Four hours ago, I asked for a different seat on my flight back to San Diego, and they gave me one. On an entirely different airplane. Leaving seven hours later than my original flight.
I’m not complaining. They also bought me dinner and gave me a $500 travel voucher.
So at the moment, I am feeling a little bit like Tom Hanks in “The Terminal”, except that I will probably not have time to build a fountain and I will absolutely not be romancing any flight attendants, particularly ones that look like Catherine Zeta Jones.
I did buy a book at Borders, though.
It’s an interesting experience, spending a day at the airport. I like the atmosphere, though I have to admit that I’m not too fond of the lack of any quiet places. Nine hours of CNN will drive anyone bonkers. And, of course, there are those people who will sit next to you in an otherwise empty waiting area so that they can use their cell phones. Quick shout out to the guy who keeps pacing back and forth by my chair: Thank you for finding the one thing that’s more annoying than simply sitting near me and shouting into your phone.
It’s wise to have some things lined up to do if you’re spending a day in the airport. Now, to be fair, I spent the afternoon in the airport at Pensacola on Monday, waiting for my travel partner…and didn’t need anything to keep me busy. There’s an observation area in the terminal, and I spent the afternoon watching airplanes take off and land…something I hadn’t done since I was a kid. It brought back some terrific memories of weekend afternoons with my dad, pointing up into the sky and learning to recognize airplanes by their shape and sound.
This afternoon, however, I stopped by the video store (yes, they have one in the Houston airport), and purchased a copy of “Must Love Dogs”.
First, I’d like to point out that this is not a good movie for a single guy to watch. That said, it’s still better than reading James Patterson’s Sam’s Letters to Jennifer. Wonderful book, but not to be attempted without a box of Kleenex at the ready. (If you can read this book without getting misty-eyed, you are made of iron. Not just your heart. Your entire being.)
Because the Houston airport isn’t well suited for plane-watching, I’ve been spending a bit of the afternoon people watching. Let me paint a mental image for you: I am seated with my back to the windows, facing the waiting area and the concourse beyond, because people are more interesting to watch than parked airplanes To my left is an aluminum-shrouded pillar, which has the electrical outlet needed to juice my laptop. To my right is a row of chairs, and suspended from the ceiling 10 yards away is the HDTV screen showing CNN nonstop. Non-frigging-stop. (How nonstop? I am able to monitor Ariel Sharon’s condition more closely than his own doctors are.) I am alternating moments of furious tapping at my keyboard with peering over the top of my glasses at the people around me and passing by. Some of these people go by several times, and have been going by for hours. I am apparently not alone; there is unquestionably a whole community of Airport Lifers here today. Some of them I am particularly curious about: the pretty blonde in the purple sweater who has, in the last ten minutes, twice gone by on the moving walkway in both directions and just went by on the courtesy cart twice, once in each direction. What is that about? Perhaps she is triplets.
While I’m thinking about it, I’d like to honor the high point of my trip today: as I passed through security in Pensacola, the TSA agent checking IDs looked at my retired military ID card and thanked me like this: “Have a great trip today, Kurt, and thank you for everything you’ve done.”
A week later: I came away from the day at the airport with an overwhelming sense of goodwill toward my fellow travelers, and people in general. I know this is not as curmudgeonly as I’m sure most of you prefer me to be…but it is a fact; most of the people I encountered were, like me, just trying to get where they were going without too much trouble.
That feeling was undoubtedly influenced by the fact that the seat they finally gave me was a window seat in First Class. This was a first for me, and let me tell you...I wouldn’t mind travel at all if I could do it that way every time. It was worth the extra seven hours in the terminal to sit where I didn’t have to ask the guy in front of me to take pity on my knees.
It was a good trip.
“What are we but our stories?” – James Patterson
Yes.
Okay, as I write this, it’s not hanging there yet, but it will be as soon as I can get home and fire up the printer. And find the tape. Because having a teenager in the house means that you can never find the tape. Or the scissors.
At the moment, I am sitting in the Houston International Airport terminal at six in the evening. Four hours ago, I asked for a different seat on my flight back to San Diego, and they gave me one. On an entirely different airplane. Leaving seven hours later than my original flight.
I’m not complaining. They also bought me dinner and gave me a $500 travel voucher.
So at the moment, I am feeling a little bit like Tom Hanks in “The Terminal”, except that I will probably not have time to build a fountain and I will absolutely not be romancing any flight attendants, particularly ones that look like Catherine Zeta Jones.
I did buy a book at Borders, though.
It’s an interesting experience, spending a day at the airport. I like the atmosphere, though I have to admit that I’m not too fond of the lack of any quiet places. Nine hours of CNN will drive anyone bonkers. And, of course, there are those people who will sit next to you in an otherwise empty waiting area so that they can use their cell phones. Quick shout out to the guy who keeps pacing back and forth by my chair: Thank you for finding the one thing that’s more annoying than simply sitting near me and shouting into your phone.
It’s wise to have some things lined up to do if you’re spending a day in the airport. Now, to be fair, I spent the afternoon in the airport at Pensacola on Monday, waiting for my travel partner…and didn’t need anything to keep me busy. There’s an observation area in the terminal, and I spent the afternoon watching airplanes take off and land…something I hadn’t done since I was a kid. It brought back some terrific memories of weekend afternoons with my dad, pointing up into the sky and learning to recognize airplanes by their shape and sound.
This afternoon, however, I stopped by the video store (yes, they have one in the Houston airport), and purchased a copy of “Must Love Dogs”.
First, I’d like to point out that this is not a good movie for a single guy to watch. That said, it’s still better than reading James Patterson’s Sam’s Letters to Jennifer. Wonderful book, but not to be attempted without a box of Kleenex at the ready. (If you can read this book without getting misty-eyed, you are made of iron. Not just your heart. Your entire being.)
Because the Houston airport isn’t well suited for plane-watching, I’ve been spending a bit of the afternoon people watching. Let me paint a mental image for you: I am seated with my back to the windows, facing the waiting area and the concourse beyond, because people are more interesting to watch than parked airplanes To my left is an aluminum-shrouded pillar, which has the electrical outlet needed to juice my laptop. To my right is a row of chairs, and suspended from the ceiling 10 yards away is the HDTV screen showing CNN nonstop. Non-frigging-stop. (How nonstop? I am able to monitor Ariel Sharon’s condition more closely than his own doctors are.) I am alternating moments of furious tapping at my keyboard with peering over the top of my glasses at the people around me and passing by. Some of these people go by several times, and have been going by for hours. I am apparently not alone; there is unquestionably a whole community of Airport Lifers here today. Some of them I am particularly curious about: the pretty blonde in the purple sweater who has, in the last ten minutes, twice gone by on the moving walkway in both directions and just went by on the courtesy cart twice, once in each direction. What is that about? Perhaps she is triplets.
While I’m thinking about it, I’d like to honor the high point of my trip today: as I passed through security in Pensacola, the TSA agent checking IDs looked at my retired military ID card and thanked me like this: “Have a great trip today, Kurt, and thank you for everything you’ve done.”
A week later: I came away from the day at the airport with an overwhelming sense of goodwill toward my fellow travelers, and people in general. I know this is not as curmudgeonly as I’m sure most of you prefer me to be…but it is a fact; most of the people I encountered were, like me, just trying to get where they were going without too much trouble.
That feeling was undoubtedly influenced by the fact that the seat they finally gave me was a window seat in First Class. This was a first for me, and let me tell you...I wouldn’t mind travel at all if I could do it that way every time. It was worth the extra seven hours in the terminal to sit where I didn’t have to ask the guy in front of me to take pity on my knees.
It was a good trip.
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Hope
Just a quick follow-up on my sister’s baby.
She could not possibly have chosen better parents.
I wrote a note to them yesterday, just to say a) I love them and b) that they’re being prayed for more than they know. (Thank you all!)
The response they sent was hilarious, as they played off each other’s e-mails. Yes, they’re shocked, and worried, and saddened…but they are meeting this new challenge with grace and humor and love (and six hours of Internet research).
As my brother-in-law put it, “I love my daughter. I love my wife. I love this family. We’ll get through this.”
And apparently, we’ll laugh, while we’re doing it.
She could not possibly have chosen better parents.
I wrote a note to them yesterday, just to say a) I love them and b) that they’re being prayed for more than they know. (Thank you all!)
The response they sent was hilarious, as they played off each other’s e-mails. Yes, they’re shocked, and worried, and saddened…but they are meeting this new challenge with grace and humor and love (and six hours of Internet research).
As my brother-in-law put it, “I love my daughter. I love my wife. I love this family. We’ll get through this.”
And apparently, we’ll laugh, while we’re doing it.
Monday, January 16, 2006
Please Pray
My sister called this morning. While looking at the ultrasound during her monthly prenatal visit, the doctor found a number of tumors growing on her baby’s heart.
They were not there last month.
There is no way of knowing if they are malignant, but even if they are benign, the problems they could cause include brain damage. (As of this morning, the word benign has been redefined for me, and if I had my way, doctors would be required to deliver the news of a benign tumor with a healthy dose of sarcasm, and an exaggerated wink. Or maybe a facial tic.)
Your prayers will help.
They were not there last month.
There is no way of knowing if they are malignant, but even if they are benign, the problems they could cause include brain damage. (As of this morning, the word benign has been redefined for me, and if I had my way, doctors would be required to deliver the news of a benign tumor with a healthy dose of sarcasm, and an exaggerated wink. Or maybe a facial tic.)
Your prayers will help.
The Chickens Were Oblivious
Having bludgeoned classic literature beyond recognition, Hollywood is taking its cudgel to the great legends.
I do not want my King Arthur demystified, thank you. When I was growing up, I loved the idea of having a wizard for a teacher, and I loved that there could be wizards. I never related to Arthur, but I worshipped Merlin. As I grew older, my understanding of Merlin’s character deepened, and I love the thought of someone so insightful that he could teach a boy (and then advise a man) how to create peace and unity that would last a thousand years, yet be so completely clueless about women. (Now, in my forties, I find it’s a delicious piece of Truth that it’s easier to build a country than it is to understand a woman.) The story is a good one by itself, but it loses something without its magic.
Now, Hollywood has taken the mystery out of the story of Tristan and Isolde, reducing it to a story about two young people so good looking that they couldn’t resist each other. All the way through, I kept asking myself, “Why?” I can understand why he’d fall for the pretty girl who nurtures him back to health with skills only she possesses. But wouldn’t a woman so caring and talented and wise look for reasonably equal depth in the man she chooses? The deepest conversation they had was when she read poetry to him, poetry he admitted he didn’t understand. And then, suddenly, they’re naked.
That was when the movie lost me.
Now, in the legend, Tristan plays the harp, and wins Isolde’s heart with his music. Also, he kills a dragon, proving to everyone that he’s not a harping nancy-boy. (He has also killed Morholt, the giant, poison-blade-wielding knight, which proves that his killing the dragon was not an accident.) I mean, there’s something a woman-of-depth can sink her metaphoric teeth into: a guy who can slay giants and knights and play the harp has got to be a keeper.
Now, as if the music and the prowess with the sword (there’s some symbolism for you, a thousand years before David Lynch), in the legend, it turns out that Isolde’s mother (also named Isolde…as is the woman Tristan eventually marries…and we think The OC is hard to follow?) is quite the whiz with a potion, and Tristan and Isolde accidentally drink some of the stuff. They, uh, drank the kool aid.
By the time Tristan returns to his family, and they’re amazed that he’s not dead, I was ready to walk out, but the movie reeled me back in. Here’s how it happened: There is a wide shot as Lord Marke (Rufus Sewell) greets the returning/resurrected Tristan, and in the foreground…there are a pair of chickens pecking at the ground. Why were they in the shot, I wondered. They didn’t add anything to the story. Or did they?
I began to look for other hidden clues. More symbolic poultry, perhaps. A horse that winks knowingly at the camera.
You see, those chickens in the foreground represent us. You and me. Those chickens are Hollywood’s audience, pecking at the ground for bits of nutritious entertainment, because that’s what we’re reduced to.
I want my dragons back.
I do not want my King Arthur demystified, thank you. When I was growing up, I loved the idea of having a wizard for a teacher, and I loved that there could be wizards. I never related to Arthur, but I worshipped Merlin. As I grew older, my understanding of Merlin’s character deepened, and I love the thought of someone so insightful that he could teach a boy (and then advise a man) how to create peace and unity that would last a thousand years, yet be so completely clueless about women. (Now, in my forties, I find it’s a delicious piece of Truth that it’s easier to build a country than it is to understand a woman.) The story is a good one by itself, but it loses something without its magic.
Now, Hollywood has taken the mystery out of the story of Tristan and Isolde, reducing it to a story about two young people so good looking that they couldn’t resist each other. All the way through, I kept asking myself, “Why?” I can understand why he’d fall for the pretty girl who nurtures him back to health with skills only she possesses. But wouldn’t a woman so caring and talented and wise look for reasonably equal depth in the man she chooses? The deepest conversation they had was when she read poetry to him, poetry he admitted he didn’t understand. And then, suddenly, they’re naked.
That was when the movie lost me.
Now, in the legend, Tristan plays the harp, and wins Isolde’s heart with his music. Also, he kills a dragon, proving to everyone that he’s not a harping nancy-boy. (He has also killed Morholt, the giant, poison-blade-wielding knight, which proves that his killing the dragon was not an accident.) I mean, there’s something a woman-of-depth can sink her metaphoric teeth into: a guy who can slay giants and knights and play the harp has got to be a keeper.
Now, as if the music and the prowess with the sword (there’s some symbolism for you, a thousand years before David Lynch), in the legend, it turns out that Isolde’s mother (also named Isolde…as is the woman Tristan eventually marries…and we think The OC is hard to follow?) is quite the whiz with a potion, and Tristan and Isolde accidentally drink some of the stuff. They, uh, drank the kool aid.
By the time Tristan returns to his family, and they’re amazed that he’s not dead, I was ready to walk out, but the movie reeled me back in. Here’s how it happened: There is a wide shot as Lord Marke (Rufus Sewell) greets the returning/resurrected Tristan, and in the foreground…there are a pair of chickens pecking at the ground. Why were they in the shot, I wondered. They didn’t add anything to the story. Or did they?
I began to look for other hidden clues. More symbolic poultry, perhaps. A horse that winks knowingly at the camera.
You see, those chickens in the foreground represent us. You and me. Those chickens are Hollywood’s audience, pecking at the ground for bits of nutritious entertainment, because that’s what we’re reduced to.
I want my dragons back.
Sunday, January 08, 2006
Oh, I'm Sorry...
This has been a damned short weekend, and I’m spending most of the rest of it getting ready to travel on business. I hate the whole concept of traveling on business, much less the term “traveling on business”. The implication is that I’ve somehow grown up and become one of those guys carrying a lap top case stuffed with too much crap as they shuffle down the center aisle toward a seat in Coach.
I used to travel on orders. “On orders” made it clear that I didn’t have a choice about my travel: I was ordered to shuffle down this aircraft aisle and settle into my Coach-class seat. I could delude myself with the thought, It’s all part of the sacrifice I’m making for the rest of you. As if that made flying in Seat 44F somehow noble. I have friends in Falujah, making their sacrifices, and I’m here on Delta making mine.
But now, I seem to have grown up, and I’m one of those guys with the laptop and the ass-too-wide-for-a-Coach-class seat. My legs have always been too long for Coach, and now the discomfort extends to my hips.
Not that I had any choice about this travel, either. My military boss felt I should go, so I go. He’s going, too, so I can’t even complain, really.
Last week was one of those when things just backed up and didn’t get done. The holiday on Monday screwed it all up, and even with the short week, I managed to put in an extra day and a half of work.
And I still left things undone. When I left at 3 on Saturday afternoon.
There’s an edge to this post I really didn’t intend. I’m choosing to be unapologetic; I am tired and my back is tight and I will spend my day traveling tomorrow, beginning at 4:30 am.
Aside from all the hours I worked last week, it was a great week. It was as though the Blue Fairy came through the window and tapped my work with her wand. Bing! I can see things becoming meaningful again.
I know others also often feel as though their efforts go unnoticed, unacknowledged, unrewarded, unheeded. We seem to have lost the ability to take pride in our own knowledge that we’ve done our best, and continually seek the recognition of others. We want the glory we see given to others on television or in the media, even if it is on a small scale.
You see it in the popularity of “reality” television. It occurred to me just now that the reason so many people love those shows is that the protagonists are no different from the people watching the shows. They want something better than the job they have, they’re not always perfectly articulate, they face situations they don’t like without unshakable calm, they have bad habits and blemishes and embarrassing secrets. (Sort of the same things that explained Rosie O’Donnell’s popularity.) And they are angry. Watchably angry.
People watch because of one thought: That could be me. And people do watch. And they learn.
They learn that it’s okay to be angry and aggressively defensive.
Now, there are myriad other places where we learn that behavior, so please don’t take me for one of those folks who thumps a Bible and focuses indignation on whatever happens to strike me as the Source of Society’s Decay today. I’m just saying that those shows work because they appeal to the desire we all have to be part of something, before they turn it around and make it something no one can look away from, like a multi-car pileup or a child in a wheelchair.
Anger is everywhere these days. (Even in this post.) A guy drives a car through the glass front of a restaurant. A woman drives for miles against traffic on the freeway and finally sits ranting in her car for hours. Another guy walks into a fast-food restaurant and shoots two dozen people.
Where does that come from?
When I was learning to drive, my dad taught me that if you came up behind significantly slower traffic on the freeway, you flashed your lights a couple times as a way of requesting a clear lane. These days, that’s a good way to provoke a psychotic game of bumper tag. (Tailgating is apparently considered acceptably less aggressive, but not by me.)
Toot your horn at someone who has just narrowly missed causing an accident, and you’re going to get the Bird at a minimum, and more if you happen to be going the same direction.
Even while walking, people are inclined to step into your path without regard for the consequences, and then bluster at the person they cut off. Shopping carts will only stop if they’re blocking the aisle. (Go to any Wal-Mart or Target and you’ll see what I mean.) Now that I think about it, strollers work the same way, especially the expensive ones.
It all adds up. I used to be considered a very patient man, but even I spend most of my time with a good head of steam going, and one of these days, I’m going to treat some idiot who rolls his suitcase over my foot to a verbal explosion:
WHY THE FUCK DON’T YOU LOOK WHERE YOU’RE GOING?
But, then, I’d only be contributing to the problem.
It’s a nice fantasy, though, and if you happen to see me in the airport tomorrow, wearing a smile on my face, you’ll know exactly what I’m thinking.
A couple of generations ago, people dealt with disappointment and criticism better. They accepted the blame when they were at fault, and sometimes when they weren’t. They responded politely. It’s a lost art, accepting responsibility.
Speaking of accepting responsibility, I’m going to take the blame for this meandering post. Not terribly coherent tonight.
Good night, all. I gotta go finish packing.
I used to travel on orders. “On orders” made it clear that I didn’t have a choice about my travel: I was ordered to shuffle down this aircraft aisle and settle into my Coach-class seat. I could delude myself with the thought, It’s all part of the sacrifice I’m making for the rest of you. As if that made flying in Seat 44F somehow noble. I have friends in Falujah, making their sacrifices, and I’m here on Delta making mine.
But now, I seem to have grown up, and I’m one of those guys with the laptop and the ass-too-wide-for-a-Coach-class seat. My legs have always been too long for Coach, and now the discomfort extends to my hips.
Not that I had any choice about this travel, either. My military boss felt I should go, so I go. He’s going, too, so I can’t even complain, really.
Last week was one of those when things just backed up and didn’t get done. The holiday on Monday screwed it all up, and even with the short week, I managed to put in an extra day and a half of work.
And I still left things undone. When I left at 3 on Saturday afternoon.
There’s an edge to this post I really didn’t intend. I’m choosing to be unapologetic; I am tired and my back is tight and I will spend my day traveling tomorrow, beginning at 4:30 am.
Aside from all the hours I worked last week, it was a great week. It was as though the Blue Fairy came through the window and tapped my work with her wand. Bing! I can see things becoming meaningful again.
I know others also often feel as though their efforts go unnoticed, unacknowledged, unrewarded, unheeded. We seem to have lost the ability to take pride in our own knowledge that we’ve done our best, and continually seek the recognition of others. We want the glory we see given to others on television or in the media, even if it is on a small scale.
You see it in the popularity of “reality” television. It occurred to me just now that the reason so many people love those shows is that the protagonists are no different from the people watching the shows. They want something better than the job they have, they’re not always perfectly articulate, they face situations they don’t like without unshakable calm, they have bad habits and blemishes and embarrassing secrets. (Sort of the same things that explained Rosie O’Donnell’s popularity.) And they are angry. Watchably angry.
People watch because of one thought: That could be me. And people do watch. And they learn.
They learn that it’s okay to be angry and aggressively defensive.
Now, there are myriad other places where we learn that behavior, so please don’t take me for one of those folks who thumps a Bible and focuses indignation on whatever happens to strike me as the Source of Society’s Decay today. I’m just saying that those shows work because they appeal to the desire we all have to be part of something, before they turn it around and make it something no one can look away from, like a multi-car pileup or a child in a wheelchair.
Anger is everywhere these days. (Even in this post.) A guy drives a car through the glass front of a restaurant. A woman drives for miles against traffic on the freeway and finally sits ranting in her car for hours. Another guy walks into a fast-food restaurant and shoots two dozen people.
Where does that come from?
When I was learning to drive, my dad taught me that if you came up behind significantly slower traffic on the freeway, you flashed your lights a couple times as a way of requesting a clear lane. These days, that’s a good way to provoke a psychotic game of bumper tag. (Tailgating is apparently considered acceptably less aggressive, but not by me.)
Toot your horn at someone who has just narrowly missed causing an accident, and you’re going to get the Bird at a minimum, and more if you happen to be going the same direction.
Even while walking, people are inclined to step into your path without regard for the consequences, and then bluster at the person they cut off. Shopping carts will only stop if they’re blocking the aisle. (Go to any Wal-Mart or Target and you’ll see what I mean.) Now that I think about it, strollers work the same way, especially the expensive ones.
It all adds up. I used to be considered a very patient man, but even I spend most of my time with a good head of steam going, and one of these days, I’m going to treat some idiot who rolls his suitcase over my foot to a verbal explosion:
WHY THE FUCK DON’T YOU LOOK WHERE YOU’RE GOING?
But, then, I’d only be contributing to the problem.
It’s a nice fantasy, though, and if you happen to see me in the airport tomorrow, wearing a smile on my face, you’ll know exactly what I’m thinking.
A couple of generations ago, people dealt with disappointment and criticism better. They accepted the blame when they were at fault, and sometimes when they weren’t. They responded politely. It’s a lost art, accepting responsibility.
Speaking of accepting responsibility, I’m going to take the blame for this meandering post. Not terribly coherent tonight.
Good night, all. I gotta go finish packing.
Thursday, January 05, 2006
Please?
We hung out, completely at ease with each other. Before we even got to dinner, she asked me to the movies this weekend.
We had dinner at Outback Steak House, followed by shopping for music and DVDs.
I cracked her up with a story about going on Fly Safari in the basement of Farr’s Sporting Goods when I was high school. (I was a crack shot with a rubber band, stalking the Wild Late Summer Housefly through the aisles of the Camping Goods Department.) She regaled me with war stories from behind the counter at McDonald’s.
We shared a hot fudge sundae for dessert.
When I took her home, she hugged me, unabashedly.
Lord, I know she’s got to grow up, but is it too much to ask that this year, the year she’s seventeen, drag its feet? Just a little?
We had dinner at Outback Steak House, followed by shopping for music and DVDs.
I cracked her up with a story about going on Fly Safari in the basement of Farr’s Sporting Goods when I was high school. (I was a crack shot with a rubber band, stalking the Wild Late Summer Housefly through the aisles of the Camping Goods Department.) She regaled me with war stories from behind the counter at McDonald’s.
We shared a hot fudge sundae for dessert.
When I took her home, she hugged me, unabashedly.
Lord, I know she’s got to grow up, but is it too much to ask that this year, the year she’s seventeen, drag its feet? Just a little?
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
Belated Holiday Greetings
I know that it’s been a while since I posted, but I have been on a quest of sorts, searching for just the perfect greeting for the New Year (and, in fact, the Entire Holiday Season, whatever you conceive it to be). I cannot claim to have written this, but it’s worth putting up here, anyhow.
Here it is, my New Year’s Greeting to you all:
Dear All (not to imply that you should also hold me dear),
Please accept with no obligation, implied or expressed, our best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.
Here’s to a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling, and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2006, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make our country great, (not to imply that our country is necessarily greater than any other country), and without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith, or sexual preference of the wishee.
By accepting this greeting, you are accepting the following terms: This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for her/himself or others, and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year, or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.
And, as always, the above greeting is void where prohibited by law.
With Platonic Love (and Non-sexual Affection),
Kurt
Here it is, my New Year’s Greeting to you all:
Dear All (not to imply that you should also hold me dear),
Please accept with no obligation, implied or expressed, our best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.
Here’s to a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling, and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2006, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make our country great, (not to imply that our country is necessarily greater than any other country), and without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith, or sexual preference of the wishee.
By accepting this greeting, you are accepting the following terms: This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for her/himself or others, and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year, or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.
And, as always, the above greeting is void where prohibited by law.
With Platonic Love (and Non-sexual Affection),
Kurt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


